Model comparison

Claude 3 Sonnet vs Grok Build 0.1

Grok Build 0.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.8 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Sonnet Anthropic

28.8

Rank #311 Confirmed

Grok Build 0.1 xAI

35.8

Rank #214 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in coding, where Grok Build 0.1 leads 42.5 to 29.2.

Side by side

Claude 3 Sonnet and Grok Build 0.1 specifications
Claude 3 SonnetGrok Build 0.1
ProviderAnthropicxAI
Noometry Index28.835.8
Released2024-02-292026-04-16
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—256K
Max output—256K
Input $ / M tokens—$1
Output $ / M tokens—$2
Results tracked303

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok Build 0.1 leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 29.2 (#296), Grok Build 0.1: 42.5 (#90)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetGrok Build 0.1
SciCode—50.2%
WeirdML10.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct42.7%—
LMArena Coding1223—
BigCodeBench Complete53.8%—
HumanEval+64%—
MBPP+69.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: —, Grok Build 0.1: 22.5 (#122)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetGrok Build 0.1
GBAEval—2.4%

Reasoning Grok Build 0.1 leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 19.7 (#232), Grok Build 0.1: 31.3 (#73)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetGrok Build 0.1
CritPt—9.1%
LMArena Hard Prompts1197—
DTBench53.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index120.69—
WinoGrande75.1%—

Math Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 10.0 (#305), Grok Build 0.1: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetGrok Build 0.1
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.5%—
LMArena Math1213—
MATH Level 518.2%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 21.1 (#271), Grok Build 0.1: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetGrok Build 0.1
GPQA Diamond40.6%—
LMArena Expert1173—
MMLU75.9%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 24.7 (#120), Grok Build 0.1: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetGrok Build 0.1
LMArena Vision984—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 38.0 (#229), Grok Build 0.1: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetGrok Build 0.1
LMArena Non-English1205—
LMArena Chinese1188—
LMArena French1228—
LMArena German1204—
LMArena Japanese1131—
LMArena Korean1128—
LMArena Russian1227—
LMArena Spanish1204—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 63.1 (#230), Grok Build 0.1: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetGrok Build 0.1
LMArena Instruction Following1200—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 36.7 (#223), Grok Build 0.1: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetGrok Build 0.1
LMArena Longer Query1211—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 42.3 (#233), Grok Build 0.1: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetGrok Build 0.1
LMArena Text1218—
LMArena Creative Writing1186—
LMArena Multi-Turn1227—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Sonnet better than Grok Build 0.1?

Grok Build 0.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.8 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Sonnet or Grok Build 0.1 better for coding?

Grok Build 0.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.5 versus 29.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Sonnet and Grok Build 0.1 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Sonnet has 30 scored results on Noometry and Grok Build 0.1 has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper