Model comparison

Claude 3 Sonnet vs Granite 4.2 30b

Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Sonnet Anthropic

29.0

Rank #319 Confirmed

Granite 4.2 30b IBM

41.8

Rank #130 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Sonnet scores higher in 0 categories and Granite 4.2 30b in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Granite 4.2 30b leads 39.1 to 21.1.
  • Granite 4.2 30b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3 Sonnet and Granite 4.2 30b specifications
Claude 3 SonnetGranite 4.2 30b
ProviderAnthropicIBM
Noometry Index29.041.8
Released2024-02-29—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3011

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 4.2 30b leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 29.6 (#302), Granite 4.2 30b: 41.0 (#126)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetGranite 4.2 30b
LMArena Coding12231396
WeirdML10.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct42.7%—
BigCodeBench Complete53.8%—
HumanEval+64%—
MBPP+69.3%—

Reasoning Granite 4.2 30b leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 20.5 (#237), Granite 4.2 30b: 27.8 (#112)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetGranite 4.2 30b
LMArena Hard Prompts11971374
DTBench53.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index120.7—
WinoGrande75.1%—

Math Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 10.7 (#310), Granite 4.2 30b: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetGranite 4.2 30b
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.5%—
LMArena Math1213—
MATH Level 518.2%—

Knowledge Granite 4.2 30b leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 21.1 (#276), Granite 4.2 30b: 39.1 (#138)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetGranite 4.2 30b
LMArena Expert11731406
GPQA Diamond40.6%—
MMLU75.9%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 25.2 (#125), Granite 4.2 30b: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetGranite 4.2 30b
LMArena Vision984—

Multilingual Granite 4.2 30b leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 37.8 (#234), Granite 4.2 30b: 47.3 (#151)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetGranite 4.2 30b
LMArena Non-English12051340
LMArena Chinese11891414
LMArena Russian12271343
LMArena French1229—
LMArena German1204—
LMArena Japanese1131—
LMArena Korean1128—
LMArena Spanish1204—

Instruction Following Granite 4.2 30b leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 62.8 (#235), Granite 4.2 30b: 71.2 (#155)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetGranite 4.2 30b
LMArena Instruction Following11991347

Long Context Granite 4.2 30b leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 36.7 (#228), Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#140)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetGranite 4.2 30b
LMArena Longer Query12111359

Writing & Preference Granite 4.2 30b leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 42.1 (#238), Granite 4.2 30b: 53.8 (#156)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetGranite 4.2 30b
LMArena Text12181361
LMArena Creative Writing11861288
LMArena Multi-Turn12271339

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Sonnet better than Granite 4.2 30b?

Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Sonnet or Granite 4.2 30b better for coding?

Granite 4.2 30b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.0 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Sonnet and Granite 4.2 30b share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Sonnet has 30 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.2 30b has 11.

Related comparisons

Go deeper