Model comparison

Claude 3 Sonnet vs GLM-5V-Turbo

GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Sonnet Anthropic

29.0

Rank #319 Confirmed

GLM-5V-Turbo Z.ai (Zhipu)

43.8

Rank #84 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Sonnet scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-5V-Turbo in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where GLM-5V-Turbo leads 39.4 to 10.7.

Side by side

Claude 3 Sonnet and GLM-5V-Turbo specifications
Claude 3 SonnetGLM-5V-Turbo
ProviderAnthropicZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index29.043.8
Released2024-02-292026-04-01
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—200K
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.20
Output $ / M tokens—$4
Results tracked3019

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5V-Turbo leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 29.6 (#302), GLM-5V-Turbo: 42.1 (#111)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetGLM-5V-Turbo
LMArena Coding12231466
LMArena WebDev—1401
WeirdML10.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct42.7%—
BigCodeBench Complete53.8%—
HumanEval+64%—
MBPP+69.3%—

Reasoning GLM-5V-Turbo leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 20.5 (#237), GLM-5V-Turbo: 29.7 (#89)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetGLM-5V-Turbo
LMArena Hard Prompts11971443
DTBench53.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index120.7—
WinoGrande75.1%—

Math GLM-5V-Turbo leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 10.7 (#310), GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.4 (#106)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetGLM-5V-Turbo
LMArena Math12131441
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.5%—
MATH Level 518.2%—

Knowledge GLM-5V-Turbo leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 21.1 (#276), GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.6 (#117)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetGLM-5V-Turbo
LMArena Expert11731452
GPQA Diamond40.6%—
MMLU75.9%—

Multimodal GLM-5V-Turbo leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 25.2 (#125), GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.9 (#42)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetGLM-5V-Turbo
LMArena Vision9841264
LMArena Document—1416

Multilingual GLM-5V-Turbo leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 37.8 (#234), GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.0 (#73)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetGLM-5V-Turbo
LMArena Non-English12051420
LMArena Chinese11891488
LMArena French12291444
LMArena German12041423
LMArena Korean11281396
LMArena Russian12271431
LMArena Spanish12041450
LMArena Japanese1131—

Instruction Following GLM-5V-Turbo leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 62.8 (#235), GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.0 (#80)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetGLM-5V-Turbo
LMArena Instruction Following11991423

Long Context GLM-5V-Turbo leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 36.7 (#228), GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#80)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetGLM-5V-Turbo
LMArena Longer Query12111438

Writing & Preference GLM-5V-Turbo leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 42.1 (#238), GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.5 (#73)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetGLM-5V-Turbo
LMArena Text12181437
LMArena Creative Writing11861416
LMArena Multi-Turn12271432

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Sonnet better than GLM-5V-Turbo?

GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Sonnet or GLM-5V-Turbo better for coding?

GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.1 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Sonnet and GLM-5V-Turbo share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Sonnet has 30 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5V-Turbo has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper