Model comparison

Claude 3 Opus vs Step 5 Preview

Step 5 Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.9 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Opus Anthropic

29.5

Rank #310 Confirmed

Step 5 Preview StepFun

47.9

Rank #58 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Opus scores higher in 0 categories and Step 5 Preview in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Step 5 Preview leads 46.1 to 14.8.

Side by side

Claude 3 Opus and Step 5 Preview specifications
Claude 3 OpusStep 5 Preview
ProviderAnthropicStepFun
Noometry Index29.547.9
Released2024-02-292026-09-16
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1.02M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1
Output $ / M tokens—$2.70
Results tracked4618

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 5 Preview leads

Claude 3 Opus: 32.9 (#267), Step 5 Preview: 51.8 (#36)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusStep 5 Preview
LMArena Coding12641480
LMArena WebDev—1564
SciCode—58.9%
WeirdML19.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct45.5%—
LiveBench Coding38.6%—
BigCodeBench Complete57.4%—
HumanEval+77.4%—
MBPP+73.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 24.6 (#116), Step 5 Preview: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusStep 5 Preview
Cybench10%—
METR Time Horizons29.5%—

Reasoning Step 5 Preview leads

Claude 3 Opus: 14.6 (#324), Step 5 Preview: 40.0 (#57)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusStep 5 Preview
LMArena Hard Prompts12451465
SimpleBench23.5%—
CritPt—20.9%
Chess Puzzles5%—
EnigmaEval0.8%—
LiveBench Reasoning40.6%—
DTBench61.6%—
LiveBench Data Analysis57.9%—
LMCA17%—
Epoch Capabilities Index126.91—
ForecastBench58.4—
LiveBench49.2%—
WinoGrande88.5%—

Math Step 5 Preview leads

Claude 3 Opus: 14.8 (#299), Step 5 Preview: 46.1 (#72)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusStep 5 Preview
LMArena Math12731470
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.7%—
ProofBench—42%
LiveBench Math43.6%—
MATH Level 537.5%—

Knowledge Step 5 Preview leads

Claude 3 Opus: 24.5 (#267), Step 5 Preview: 41.2 (#112)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusStep 5 Preview
LMArena Expert12231470
GPQA Diamond47.2%—
SimpleQA Verified12.6%—
Confabulations22.7%—
MMLU84.6%—

Multimodal Step 5 Preview leads

Claude 3 Opus: 27.1 (#116), Step 5 Preview: 41.0 (#41)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusStep 5 Preview
LMArena Vision10231267

Multilingual Step 5 Preview leads

Claude 3 Opus: 41.4 (#207), Step 5 Preview: 53.8 (#54)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusStep 5 Preview
LMArena Non-English12581432
LMArena Chinese12481519
LMArena Russian12801436
LMArena Spanish12461439
LMArena French1275—
LMArena German1258—
LMArena Japanese1204—
LMArena Korean1187—

Instruction Following Step 5 Preview leads

Claude 3 Opus: 64.1 (#228), Step 5 Preview: 76.0 (#50)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusStep 5 Preview
LMArena Instruction Following12481444
LiveBench Instruction Following63.9%—

Long Context Step 5 Preview leads

Claude 3 Opus: 38.2 (#202), Step 5 Preview: 44.5 (#64)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusStep 5 Preview
LMArena Longer Query12591455

Writing & Preference Step 5 Preview leads

Claude 3 Opus: 47.2 (#213), Step 5 Preview: 62.8 (#71)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusStep 5 Preview
LMArena Text12621442
LMArena Creative Writing12351410
LMArena Multi-Turn12751447
LiveBench Language50.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Opus better than Step 5 Preview?

Step 5 Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.9 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Opus or Step 5 Preview better for coding?

Step 5 Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.8 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Opus and Step 5 Preview share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Opus has 46 scored results on Noometry and Step 5 Preview has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper