Model comparison

Claude 3 Opus vs Phi-2

Claude 3 Opus has enough public results to be ranked (#310); Phi-2 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Opus Anthropic

29.5

Rank #310 Confirmed

Phi-2 Microsoft

—

Unranked

Summary

  • They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both.
  • Phi-2 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3 Opus and Phi-2 specifications
Claude 3 OpusPhi-2
ProviderAnthropicMicrosoft
Noometry Index29.5—
Released2024-02-292023-12-12
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked4611

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 32.9 (#267), Phi-2: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusPhi-2
HumanEval+77.4%45.1%
MBPP+73.3%54.2%
WeirdML19.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct45.5%—
LiveBench Coding38.6%—
LMArena Coding1264—
BigCodeBench Complete57.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 24.6 (#116), Phi-2: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusPhi-2
Cybench10%—
METR Time Horizons29.5%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 14.6 (#324), Phi-2: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusPhi-2
Epoch Capabilities Index126.91107.94
WinoGrande88.5%54.7%
SimpleBench23.5%—
Chess Puzzles5%—
EnigmaEval0.8%—
LiveBench Reasoning40.6%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1245—
DTBench61.6%—
LiveBench Data Analysis57.9%—
LMCA17%—
Adversarial NLI—42.5%
BIG-Bench Hard—59.4%
ForecastBench58.4—
HellaSwag—53.6%
LiveBench49.2%—

Math Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 14.8 (#299), Phi-2: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusPhi-2
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.7%—
LiveBench Math43.6%—
LMArena Math1273—
MATH Level 537.5%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 24.5 (#267), Phi-2: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusPhi-2
MMLU84.6%58.4%
GPQA Diamond47.2%—
SimpleQA Verified12.6%—
Confabulations22.7%—
LMArena Expert1223—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—75.9%
OpenBookQA—73.6%
TriviaQA—45.2%

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 27.1 (#116), Phi-2: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusPhi-2
LMArena Vision1023—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 41.4 (#207), Phi-2: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusPhi-2
LMArena Non-English1258—
LMArena Chinese1248—
LMArena French1275—
LMArena German1258—
LMArena Japanese1204—
LMArena Korean1187—
LMArena Russian1280—
LMArena Spanish1246—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 64.1 (#228), Phi-2: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusPhi-2
LiveBench Instruction Following63.9%—
LMArena Instruction Following1248—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 38.2 (#202), Phi-2: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusPhi-2
LMArena Longer Query1259—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 47.2 (#213), Phi-2: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusPhi-2
LMArena Text1262—
LMArena Creative Writing1235—
LMArena Multi-Turn1275—
LiveBench Language50.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Opus better than Phi-2?

Claude 3 Opus has enough public results to be ranked (#310); Phi-2 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Opus and Phi-2 share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Opus has 46 scored results on Noometry and Phi-2 has 11.

Related comparisons

Go deeper