Model comparison

Claude 3 Opus vs Mistral Medium 3.1

Mistral Medium 3.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Opus Anthropic

29.5

Rank #310 Confirmed

Mistral Medium 3.1 Mistral AI

31.9

Rank #266 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Medium 3.1 leads 55.5 to 47.2.

Side by side

Claude 3 Opus and Mistral Medium 3.1 specifications
Claude 3 OpusMistral Medium 3.1
ProviderAnthropicMistral AI
Noometry Index29.531.9
Released2024-02-29—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—131K
Max output—105K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$2
Results tracked463

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 32.9 (#267), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMistral Medium 3.1
WeirdML19.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct45.5%—
LiveBench Coding38.6%—
LMArena Coding1264—
BigCodeBench Complete57.4%—
HumanEval+77.4%—
MBPP+73.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 24.6 (#116), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMistral Medium 3.1
Cybench10%—
METR Time Horizons29.5%—

Reasoning Claude 3 Opus leads

Claude 3 Opus: 14.6 (#324), Mistral Medium 3.1: 10.6 (#341)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMistral Medium 3.1
SimpleBench23.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)—6.5%
Chess Puzzles5%—
EnigmaEval0.8%—
Thematic Generalization—20.3%
LiveBench Reasoning40.6%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1245—
DTBench61.6%—
LiveBench Data Analysis57.9%—
LMCA17%—
Epoch Capabilities Index126.91—
ForecastBench58.4—
LiveBench49.2%—
WinoGrande88.5%—

Math Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 14.8 (#299), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMistral Medium 3.1
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.7%—
LiveBench Math43.6%—
LMArena Math1273—
MATH Level 537.5%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 24.5 (#267), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMistral Medium 3.1
GPQA Diamond47.2%—
SimpleQA Verified12.6%—
Confabulations22.7%—
LMArena Expert1223—
MMLU84.6%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 27.1 (#116), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Vision1023—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 41.4 (#207), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Non-English1258—
LMArena Chinese1248—
LMArena French1275—
LMArena German1258—
LMArena Japanese1204—
LMArena Korean1187—
LMArena Russian1280—
LMArena Spanish1246—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 64.1 (#228), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMistral Medium 3.1
LiveBench Instruction Following63.9%—
LMArena Instruction Following1248—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 38.2 (#202), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Longer Query1259—

Writing & Preference Mistral Medium 3.1 leads

Claude 3 Opus: 47.2 (#213), Mistral Medium 3.1: 55.5 (#145)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text1262—
LMArena Creative Writing1235—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1476
LMArena Multi-Turn1275—
LiveBench Language50.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Opus better than Mistral Medium 3.1?

Mistral Medium 3.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Opus and Mistral Medium 3.1 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Opus has 46 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.1 has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper