Model comparison
Claude 3 Opus vs Llama 3-70B
Claude 3 Opus and Llama 3-70B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.5 vs 28.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 30 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 30 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Opus scores higher in 7 categories and Llama 3-70B in 2 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Claude 3 Opus leads 41.4 to 33.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 37.5% for Claude 3 Opus and 22.6% for Llama 3-70B.
- Llama 3-70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 3 Opus | Llama 3-70B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 29.5 | 28.8 |
| Released | 2024-02-29 | 2024-04-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 46 | 31 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Llama 3-70B leads
Claude 3 Opus: 32.9 (#267), Llama 3-70B: 35.8 (#218)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.5% | 43.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1264 | 1206 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.4% | 54.5% |
| HumanEval+ | 77.4% | 72% |
| MBPP+ | 73.3% | 69% |
| WeirdML | 19.2% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 38.6% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Claude 3 Opus leads
Claude 3 Opus: 24.6 (#116), Llama 3-70B: 21.1 (#139)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 10% | 5% |
| METR Time Horizons | 29.5% | — |
Reasoning Llama 3-70B leads
Claude 3 Opus: 14.6 (#324), Llama 3-70B: 18.0 (#288)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1245 | 1195 |
| DTBench | 61.6% | 54.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 126.91 | 122.93 |
| ForecastBench | 58.4 | 57.1 |
| WinoGrande | 88.5% | 83.5% |
| SimpleBench | 23.5% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 35.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | 5% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 0.8% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 40.6% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 57.9% | — |
| LMCA | 17% | — |
| LiveBench | 49.2% | — |
Math Claude 3 Opus leads
Claude 3 Opus: 14.8 (#299), Llama 3-70B: 12.8 (#305)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.7% | 4.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1273 | 1218 |
| MATH Level 5 | 37.5% | 22.6% |
| LiveBench Math | 43.6% | — |
Knowledge Claude 3 Opus leads
Claude 3 Opus: 24.5 (#267), Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#277)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 47.2% | 40.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | 1149 |
| MMLU | 84.6% | 79.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 12.6% | — |
| Confabulations | 22.7% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 3 Opus: 27.1 (#116), Llama 3-70B: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1023 | — |
Multilingual Claude 3 Opus leads
Claude 3 Opus: 41.4 (#207), Llama 3-70B: 33.6 (#251)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1258 | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1248 | 1114 |
| LMArena French | 1275 | 1232 |
| LMArena German | 1258 | 1169 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1204 | 1017 |
| LMArena Korean | 1187 | 1017 |
| LMArena Russian | 1280 | 1159 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1246 | 1241 |
Instruction Following Claude 3 Opus leads
Claude 3 Opus: 64.1 (#228), Llama 3-70B: 62.5 (#238)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1248 | 1194 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 63.9% | — |
Long Context Claude 3 Opus leads
Claude 3 Opus: 38.2 (#202), Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#240)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1259 | 1174 |
Writing & Preference Claude 3 Opus leads
Claude 3 Opus: 47.2 (#213), Llama 3-70B: 42.8 (#231)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1262 | 1221 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 1210 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1223 |
| LiveBench Language | 50.4% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3 Opus better than Llama 3-70B?
Claude 3 Opus and Llama 3-70B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.5 vs 28.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Claude 3 Opus or Llama 3-70B better for coding?
Llama 3-70B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.8 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Opus and Llama 3-70B share?
30 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Opus has 46 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-70B has 31.