Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3 Opus vs Llama 3.2 1B

Claude 3 Opus is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.3 to 19.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Opus Anthropic

29.3

Rank #300 Confirmed

Llama 3.2 1B Meta

19.9

Rank #349 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Opus scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 3.2 1B in 1 category; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Claude 3 Opus leads 47.4 to 21.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 57.4% for Claude 3 Opus and 11.3% for Llama 3.2 1B.
  • Llama 3.2 1B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3 OpusLlama 3.2 1B
ProviderAnthropicMeta
Noometry Index29.319.9
Released2024-02-292024-09-24
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—60K
Max output—54K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.027
Output $ / M tokens—$0.20
Results tracked4622

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude 3 Opus leads

Claude 3 Opus: 32.4 (#261), Llama 3.2 1B: 20.6 (#333)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusLlama 3.2 1B
BigCodeBench Instruct45.5%8.2%
LMArena Coding12641071
BigCodeBench Complete57.4%11.3%
WeirdML19.2%—
LiveBench Coding38.6%—
HumanEval+77.4%—
MBPP+73.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Claude 3 Opus leads

Claude 3 Opus: 24.3 (#110), Llama 3.2 1B: 14.5 (#142)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusLlama 3.2 1B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—10.8%
Cybench10%—
BALROG—6.6%
METR Time Horizons29.5%—

Reasoning Llama 3.2 1B leads

Claude 3 Opus: 14.2 (#318), Llama 3.2 1B: 15.6 (#304)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusLlama 3.2 1B
Chess Puzzles5%0%
LMArena Hard Prompts12461044
Epoch Capabilities Index126.91101.95
SimpleBench23.5%—
EnigmaEval0.8%—
LiveBench Reasoning40.6%—
DTBench61.6%—
LiveBench Data Analysis57.9%—
LMCA17%—
ForecastBench58.4—
LiveBench49.2%—
WinoGrande88.5%—

Math Claude 3 Opus leads

Claude 3 Opus: 13.9 (#293), Llama 3.2 1B: 9.7 (#308)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusLlama 3.2 1B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.7%0.6%
LMArena Math12731086
LiveBench Math43.6%—
MATH Level 537.5%—

Knowledge Claude 3 Opus leads

Claude 3 Opus: 24.5 (#262), Llama 3.2 1B: 7.2 (#307)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusLlama 3.2 1B
GPQA Diamond47.2%23.9%
LMArena Expert12231007
SimpleQA Verified12.6%—
Confabulations22.7%—
MMLU84.6%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 26.6 (#112), Llama 3.2 1B: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusLlama 3.2 1B
LMArena Vision1023—

Multilingual Claude 3 Opus leads

Claude 3 Opus: 41.6 (#202), Llama 3.2 1B: 23.9 (#287)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusLlama 3.2 1B
LMArena Non-English1258973
LMArena Chinese1248958
LMArena German12581014
LMArena Russian1280941
LMArena French1274—
LMArena Japanese1204—
LMArena Korean1187—
LMArena Spanish1246—

Instruction Following Claude 3 Opus leads

Claude 3 Opus: 64.3 (#223), Llama 3.2 1B: 52.6 (#285)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusLlama 3.2 1B
LMArena Instruction Following12481031
LiveBench Instruction Following63.9%—

Long Context Claude 3 Opus leads

Claude 3 Opus: 38.2 (#197), Llama 3.2 1B: 31.9 (#269)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusLlama 3.2 1B
LMArena Longer Query12591050

Writing & Preference Claude 3 Opus leads

Claude 3 Opus: 47.4 (#208), Llama 3.2 1B: 21.4 (#305)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusLlama 3.2 1B
LMArena Text12621055
LMArena Creative Writing12351033
LMArena Multi-Turn12751030
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—200
LiveBench Language50.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Opus better than Llama 3.2 1B?

Claude 3 Opus is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.3 to 19.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Opus or Llama 3.2 1B better for coding?

Claude 3 Opus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.4 versus 20.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Opus and Llama 3.2 1B share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Opus has 46 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 1B has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper