Model comparison
Claude 3 Opus vs Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.2 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Opus scores higher in 1 category and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 in 7 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads 33.0 to 13.9.
Side by side
| Claude 3 Opus | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 37.2 |
| Released | 2024-02-29 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 46 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Claude 3 Opus: 32.4 (#261), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 36.5 (#192)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1264 | 1270 |
| WeirdML | 19.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.5% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 38.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.4% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 77.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 73.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude 3 Opus: 24.3 (#110), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 10% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 29.5% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Claude 3 Opus: 14.2 (#318), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 23.9 (#157)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1246 | 1264 |
| SimpleBench | 23.5% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 5% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 0.8% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 40.6% | — |
| DTBench | 61.6% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 57.9% | — |
| LMCA | 17% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 126.91 | — |
| ForecastBench | 58.4 | — |
| LiveBench | 49.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 88.5% | — |
Math Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Claude 3 Opus: 13.9 (#293), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 33.0 (#179)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1273 | 1274 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.7% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 43.6% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 37.5% | — |
Knowledge Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Claude 3 Opus: 24.5 (#262), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 33.6 (#192)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | 1248 |
| GPQA Diamond | 47.2% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 12.6% | — |
| Confabulations | 22.7% | — |
| MMLU | 84.6% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 3 Opus: 26.6 (#112), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1023 | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
Claude 3 Opus: 41.6 (#202), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.9 (#198)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1258 | 1262 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1248 | 1319 |
| LMArena Russian | 1280 | 1258 |
| LMArena French | 1274 | — |
| LMArena German | 1258 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1204 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1187 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1246 | — |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Claude 3 Opus: 64.3 (#223), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.8 (#214)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1248 | 1245 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 63.9% | — |
Long Context Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Claude 3 Opus: 38.2 (#197), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#168)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1259 | 1301 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Claude 3 Opus: 47.4 (#208), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.4 (#209)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1262 | 1274 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 1242 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1275 |
| LiveBench Language | 50.4% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3 Opus better than Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10?
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.2 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 3 Opus or Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better for coding?
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.5 versus 32.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Opus and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Opus has 46 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12.