Model comparison

Claude 3 Opus vs Grok Build 0.1

Grok Build 0.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.8 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Opus Anthropic

29.3

Rank #300 Confirmed

Grok Build 0.1 xAI

35.8

Rank #214 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok Build 0.1 leads 31.3 to 14.2.

Side by side

Claude 3 Opus and Grok Build 0.1 specifications
Claude 3 OpusGrok Build 0.1
ProviderAnthropicxAI
Noometry Index29.335.8
Released2024-02-292026-04-16
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—256K
Max output—256K
Input $ / M tokens—$1
Output $ / M tokens—$2
Results tracked463

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok Build 0.1 leads

Claude 3 Opus: 32.4 (#261), Grok Build 0.1: 42.5 (#90)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGrok Build 0.1
SciCode—50.2%
WeirdML19.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct45.5%—
LiveBench Coding38.6%—
LMArena Coding1264—
BigCodeBench Complete57.4%—
HumanEval+77.4%—
MBPP+73.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Claude 3 Opus leads

Claude 3 Opus: 24.3 (#110), Grok Build 0.1: 22.5 (#122)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGrok Build 0.1
Cybench10%—
GBAEval—2.4%
METR Time Horizons29.5%—

Reasoning Grok Build 0.1 leads

Claude 3 Opus: 14.2 (#318), Grok Build 0.1: 31.3 (#73)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGrok Build 0.1
SimpleBench23.5%—
CritPt—9.1%
Chess Puzzles5%—
EnigmaEval0.8%—
LiveBench Reasoning40.6%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1246—
DTBench61.6%—
LiveBench Data Analysis57.9%—
LMCA17%—
Epoch Capabilities Index126.91—
ForecastBench58.4—
LiveBench49.2%—
WinoGrande88.5%—

Math Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 13.9 (#293), Grok Build 0.1: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGrok Build 0.1
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.7%—
LiveBench Math43.6%—
LMArena Math1273—
MATH Level 537.5%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 24.5 (#262), Grok Build 0.1: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGrok Build 0.1
GPQA Diamond47.2%—
SimpleQA Verified12.6%—
Confabulations22.7%—
LMArena Expert1223—
MMLU84.6%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 26.6 (#112), Grok Build 0.1: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGrok Build 0.1
LMArena Vision1023—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 41.6 (#202), Grok Build 0.1: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGrok Build 0.1
LMArena Non-English1258—
LMArena Chinese1248—
LMArena French1274—
LMArena German1258—
LMArena Japanese1204—
LMArena Korean1187—
LMArena Russian1280—
LMArena Spanish1246—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 64.3 (#223), Grok Build 0.1: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGrok Build 0.1
LiveBench Instruction Following63.9%—
LMArena Instruction Following1248—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 38.2 (#197), Grok Build 0.1: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGrok Build 0.1
LMArena Longer Query1259—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 47.4 (#208), Grok Build 0.1: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGrok Build 0.1
LMArena Text1262—
LMArena Creative Writing1235—
LMArena Multi-Turn1275—
LiveBench Language50.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Opus better than Grok Build 0.1?

Grok Build 0.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.8 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Opus or Grok Build 0.1 better for coding?

Grok Build 0.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.5 versus 32.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Opus and Grok Build 0.1 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Opus has 46 scored results on Noometry and Grok Build 0.1 has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper