Model comparison

Claude 3 Opus vs GPT-5.2 Codex

GPT-5.2 Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.6 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Opus Anthropic

29.5

Rank #310 Confirmed

GPT-5.2 Codex OpenAI

42.6

Rank #111 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where GPT-5.2 Codex leads 41.0 to 24.6.

Side by side

Claude 3 Opus and GPT-5.2 Codex specifications
Claude 3 OpusGPT-5.2 Codex
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Noometry Index29.542.6
Released2024-02-292025-12-18
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—400K
Max output—128K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.75
Output $ / M tokens—$14
Results tracked465

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.2 Codex leads

Claude 3 Opus: 32.9 (#267), GPT-5.2 Codex: 45.5 (#71)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGPT-5.2 Codex
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—72.8%
LMArena WebDev—1339
SWE-bench Multilingual—66.3%
WeirdML19.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct45.5%—
LiveBench Coding38.6%—
LMArena Coding1264—
BigCodeBench Complete57.4%—
ALE-Bench—1,300
HumanEval+77.4%—
MBPP+73.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use GPT-5.2 Codex leads

Claude 3 Opus: 24.6 (#116), GPT-5.2 Codex: 41.0 (#22)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGPT-5.2 Codex
Terminal-Bench—66.5%
Cybench10%—
METR Time Horizons29.5%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 14.6 (#324), GPT-5.2 Codex: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGPT-5.2 Codex
SimpleBench23.5%—
Chess Puzzles5%—
EnigmaEval0.8%—
LiveBench Reasoning40.6%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1245—
DTBench61.6%—
LiveBench Data Analysis57.9%—
LMCA17%—
Epoch Capabilities Index126.91—
ForecastBench58.4—
LiveBench49.2%—
WinoGrande88.5%—

Math Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 14.8 (#299), GPT-5.2 Codex: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGPT-5.2 Codex
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.7%—
LiveBench Math43.6%—
LMArena Math1273—
MATH Level 537.5%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 24.5 (#267), GPT-5.2 Codex: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGPT-5.2 Codex
GPQA Diamond47.2%—
SimpleQA Verified12.6%—
Confabulations22.7%—
LMArena Expert1223—
MMLU84.6%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 27.1 (#116), GPT-5.2 Codex: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGPT-5.2 Codex
LMArena Vision1023—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 41.4 (#207), GPT-5.2 Codex: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGPT-5.2 Codex
LMArena Non-English1258—
LMArena Chinese1248—
LMArena French1275—
LMArena German1258—
LMArena Japanese1204—
LMArena Korean1187—
LMArena Russian1280—
LMArena Spanish1246—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 64.1 (#228), GPT-5.2 Codex: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGPT-5.2 Codex
LiveBench Instruction Following63.9%—
LMArena Instruction Following1248—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 38.2 (#202), GPT-5.2 Codex: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGPT-5.2 Codex
LMArena Longer Query1259—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 47.2 (#213), GPT-5.2 Codex: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGPT-5.2 Codex
LMArena Text1262—
LMArena Creative Writing1235—
LMArena Multi-Turn1275—
LiveBench Language50.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Opus better than GPT-5.2 Codex?

GPT-5.2 Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.6 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Opus or GPT-5.2 Codex better for coding?

GPT-5.2 Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks: 45.5 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Opus and GPT-5.2 Codex share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Opus has 46 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.2 Codex has 5.

Related comparisons

Go deeper