Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3 Opus vs GLM-4.5V

GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Opus Anthropic

29.5

Rank #310 Confirmed

GLM-4.5V Z.ai (Zhipu)

39.8

Rank #158 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Opus scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-4.5V in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where GLM-4.5V leads 37.4 to 14.8.
  • GLM-4.5V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3 OpusGLM-4.5V
ProviderAnthropicZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index29.539.8
Released2024-02-292025-08-11
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—64K
Max output—16K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.60
Output $ / M tokens—$1.80
Results tracked4615

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-4.5V leads

Claude 3 Opus: 32.9 (#267), GLM-4.5V: 39.5 (#155)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGLM-4.5V
LMArena Coding12641347
WeirdML19.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct45.5%—
LiveBench Coding38.6%—
BigCodeBench Complete57.4%—
HumanEval+77.4%—
MBPP+73.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 24.6 (#116), GLM-4.5V: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGLM-4.5V
Cybench10%—
METR Time Horizons29.5%—

Reasoning GLM-4.5V leads

Claude 3 Opus: 14.6 (#324), GLM-4.5V: 27.4 (#119)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGLM-4.5V
LMArena Hard Prompts12451334
SimpleBench23.5%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark—59.8%
Chess Puzzles5%—
EnigmaEval0.8%—
LiveBench Reasoning40.6%—
DTBench61.6%—
LiveBench Data Analysis57.9%—
LMCA17%—
Epoch Capabilities Index126.91—
ForecastBench58.4—
LiveBench49.2%—
WinoGrande88.5%—

Math GLM-4.5V leads

Claude 3 Opus: 14.8 (#299), GLM-4.5V: 37.4 (#159)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGLM-4.5V
LMArena Math12731354
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.7%—
LiveBench Math43.6%—
MATH Level 537.5%—

Knowledge GLM-4.5V leads

Claude 3 Opus: 24.5 (#267), GLM-4.5V: 37.5 (#156)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGLM-4.5V
LMArena Expert12231353
GPQA Diamond47.2%—
SimpleQA Verified12.6%—
Confabulations22.7%—
MMLU84.6%—

Multimodal GLM-4.5V leads

Claude 3 Opus: 27.1 (#116), GLM-4.5V: 34.3 (#92)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGLM-4.5V
LMArena Vision10231154

Multilingual GLM-4.5V leads

Claude 3 Opus: 41.4 (#207), GLM-4.5V: 44.6 (#177)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGLM-4.5V
LMArena Non-English12581303
LMArena Chinese12481337
LMArena Russian12801298
LMArena Spanish12461336
LMArena French1275—
LMArena German1258—
LMArena Japanese1204—
LMArena Korean1187—

Instruction Following GLM-4.5V leads

Claude 3 Opus: 64.1 (#228), GLM-4.5V: 69.2 (#175)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGLM-4.5V
LMArena Instruction Following12481311
LiveBench Instruction Following63.9%—

Long Context GLM-4.5V leads

Claude 3 Opus: 38.2 (#202), GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#171)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGLM-4.5V
LMArena Longer Query12591304

Writing & Preference GLM-4.5V leads

Claude 3 Opus: 47.2 (#213), GLM-4.5V: 52.5 (#170)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGLM-4.5V
LMArena Text12621333
LMArena Creative Writing12351295
LMArena Multi-Turn12751332
LiveBench Language50.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Opus better than GLM-4.5V?

GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Opus or GLM-4.5V better for coding?

GLM-4.5V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Opus and GLM-4.5V share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Opus has 46 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.5V has 15.

Related comparisons

Go deeper