Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3 Opus vs Gemma 1.1 7b IT

Gemma 1.1 7b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.7 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Opus Anthropic

29.3

Rank #300 Confirmed

Gemma 1.1 7b IT Google

30.7

Rank #275 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Opus scores higher in 5 categories and Gemma 1.1 7b IT in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Claude 3 Opus leads 47.4 to 30.6.
  • Gemma 1.1 7b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3 OpusGemma 1.1 7b IT
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Noometry Index29.330.7
Released2024-02-29—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked4619

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude 3 Opus leads

Claude 3 Opus: 32.4 (#261), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 31.0 (#279)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Coding12641084
HumanEval+77.4%35.4%
MBPP+73.3%45%
WeirdML19.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct45.5%—
LiveBench Coding38.6%—
BigCodeBench Complete57.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 24.3 (#110), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGemma 1.1 7b IT
Cybench10%—
METR Time Horizons29.5%—

Reasoning Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads

Claude 3 Opus: 14.2 (#318), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 19.6 (#235)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Hard Prompts12461071
SimpleBench23.5%—
Chess Puzzles5%—
EnigmaEval0.8%—
LiveBench Reasoning40.6%—
DTBench61.6%—
LiveBench Data Analysis57.9%—
LMCA17%—
Epoch Capabilities Index126.91—
ForecastBench58.4—
LiveBench49.2%—
WinoGrande88.5%—

Math Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads

Claude 3 Opus: 13.9 (#293), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 29.5 (#217)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Math12731107
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.7%—
LiveBench Math43.6%—
MATH Level 537.5%—

Knowledge Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads

Claude 3 Opus: 24.5 (#262), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 27.8 (#242)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Expert12231039
GPQA Diamond47.2%—
SimpleQA Verified12.6%—
Confabulations22.7%—
MMLU84.6%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 26.6 (#112), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Vision1023—

Multilingual Claude 3 Opus leads

Claude 3 Opus: 41.6 (#202), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.3 (#268)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Non-English12581052
LMArena Chinese12481060
LMArena French12741064
LMArena German12581054
LMArena Japanese1204971
LMArena Korean1187988
LMArena Russian12801046
LMArena Spanish12461049

Instruction Following Claude 3 Opus leads

Claude 3 Opus: 64.3 (#223), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 54.3 (#278)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Instruction Following12481057
LiveBench Instruction Following63.9%—

Long Context Claude 3 Opus leads

Claude 3 Opus: 38.2 (#197), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.0 (#267)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Longer Query12591056

Writing & Preference Claude 3 Opus leads

Claude 3 Opus: 47.4 (#208), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 30.6 (#283)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Text12621094
LMArena Creative Writing12351059
LMArena Multi-Turn12751040
LiveBench Language50.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Opus better than Gemma 1.1 7b IT?

Gemma 1.1 7b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.7 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Opus or Gemma 1.1 7b IT better for coding?

Claude 3 Opus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.4 versus 31.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Opus and Gemma 1.1 7b IT share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Opus has 46 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 1.1 7b IT has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper