Model comparison

Claude 3 Opus vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.7 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 30 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Opus Anthropic

29.5

Rank #310 Confirmed

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Google

56.7

Rank #23 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 30 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Opus scores higher in 0 categories and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview in 10 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads 71.7 to 14.6.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 4.7% for Claude 3 Opus and 95.6% for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview.

Side by side

Claude 3 Opus and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview specifications
Claude 3 OpusGemini 3.1 Pro Preview
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Noometry Index29.556.7
Released2024-02-292026-02-19
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$12
Results tracked4671

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Claude 3 Opus: 32.9 (#267), Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 42.5 (#99)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGemini 3.1 Pro Preview
WeirdML19.2%72.1%
LMArena Coding12641484
SWE-bench Verified—75.6%
DeepSWE—11.7%
LMArena WebDev—1447
SciCode—58.9%
GSO—22.6%
BigCodeBench Instruct45.5%—
LiveBench Coding38.6%—
MirrorCode—8.9%
BigCodeBench Complete57.4%—
ALE-Bench—1,161
AlgoTune—2.02
HumanEval+77.4%—
MBPP+73.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Claude 3 Opus: 24.6 (#116), Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 37.7 (#34)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGemini 3.1 Pro Preview
METR Time Horizons29.5%77%
Terminal-Bench—80.2%
APEX-Agents—35.3%
τ²-bench Banking—26%
Cybench10%—
DeepResearch Bench—47.8%
PostTrainBench—22%
BALROG—57%
ExploitBench—26.1%
GBAEval—0.8%
GDP.pdf—17%
LMArena Search—1211
Vending-Bench 2—3,774

Reasoning Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Claude 3 Opus: 14.6 (#324), Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 71.7 (#12)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGemini 3.1 Pro Preview
SimpleBench23.5%79.6%
Chess Puzzles5%55%
EnigmaEval0.8%36.8%
LMArena Hard Prompts12451485
DTBench61.6%97.1%
LMCA17%53.8%
Epoch Capabilities Index126.91154.77
ForecastBench58.459
ARC-AGI-2—77.1%
NYT Connections (extended)—97.4%
ARC-AGI-1—98%
CritPt—17.7%
Thematic Generalization—79.4%
EBR-Bench—14.3%
LiveBench Reasoning40.6%—
Mystery Game Puzzles—34%
LiveBench Data Analysis57.9%—
LiveBench49.2%—
WinoGrande88.5%—

Math Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Claude 3 Opus: 14.8 (#299), Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 62.1 (#34)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGemini 3.1 Pro Preview
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.7%95.6%
LMArena Math12731485
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—59.6%
FrontierMath Tier 4—26.8%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—86.5%
ProofBench—26%
LiveBench Math43.6%—
MATH Level 537.5%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—36.9%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—16.7%

Knowledge Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Claude 3 Opus: 24.5 (#267), Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 71.8 (#3)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGemini 3.1 Pro Preview
GPQA Diamond47.2%94.4%
SimpleQA Verified12.6%73.5%
LMArena Expert12231485
Humanity's Last Exam—46.4%
Confabulations22.7%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—10.4%
MMLU84.6%—

Multimodal Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Claude 3 Opus: 27.1 (#116), Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 37.9 (#69)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Vision10231296
Blueprint-Bench 2—26.5%
Furniture Assembly—26.7%
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Claude 3 Opus: 41.4 (#207), Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 57.0 (#12)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Non-English12581477
LMArena Chinese12481529
LMArena French12751487
LMArena German12581491
LMArena Japanese12041493
LMArena Korean11871455
LMArena Russian12801498
LMArena Spanish12461479

Instruction Following Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Claude 3 Opus: 64.1 (#228), Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 77.0 (#32)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Instruction Following12481466
LiveBench Instruction Following63.9%—

Long Context Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Claude 3 Opus: 38.2 (#202), Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 47.4 (#18)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Longer Query12591483
CL-bench—20.8%
CL-bench Life—16.9%

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Claude 3 Opus: 47.2 (#213), Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 66.1 (#37)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text12621481
LMArena Creative Writing12351482
LMArena Multi-Turn12751488
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1491
EQ-Bench 4—1142
LiveBench Language50.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Opus better than Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.7 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Opus or Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview better for coding?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.5 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Opus and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview share?

30 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Opus has 46 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has 71.

Related comparisons

Go deeper