Model comparison
Claude 3 Opus vs Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024)
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.1 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 33 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 33 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Opus scores higher in 2 categories and Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) in 8 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads 25.8 to 14.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 37.5% for Claude 3 Opus and 70.4% for Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024).
Side by side
| Claude 3 Opus | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Noometry Index | 29.5 | 32.1 |
| Released | 2024-02-29 | 2024-02-15 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 46 | 45 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Claude 3 Opus: 32.9 (#267), Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 34.2 (#241)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 19.2% | 22.2% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.5% | 43.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1264 | 1294 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.4% | 57.5% |
| HumanEval+ | 77.4% | 79.3% |
| MBPP+ | 73.3% | 74.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | 38.6% | — |
| CadEval | — | 34% |
Agentic & Tool Use Claude 3 Opus leads
Claude 3 Opus: 24.6 (#116), Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 17.9 (#145)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 10% | 7.5% |
| TheAgentCompany | — | 3.4% |
| BALROG | — | 21% |
| METR Time Horizons | 29.5% | — |
Reasoning Claude 3 Opus leads
Claude 3 Opus: 14.6 (#324), Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 12.3 (#338)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 23.5% | 27.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1245 | 1296 |
| DTBench | 61.6% | 59% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 126.91 | 131.73 |
| ForecastBench | 58.4 | 58.4 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | 5% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 0.8% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 40.6% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 57.9% | — |
| LMCA | 17% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 89.2% |
| LiveBench | 49.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 88.5% | — |
Math Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Claude 3 Opus: 14.8 (#299), Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 25.8 (#266)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.7% | 23.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1273 | 1315 |
| MATH Level 5 | 37.5% | 70.4% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 36.4% |
| LiveBench Math | 43.6% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Claude 3 Opus: 24.5 (#267), Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 29.4 (#239)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 47.2% | 57.2% |
| Confabulations | 22.7% | 13.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | 1279 |
| MMLU | 84.6% | 86.9% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 4.6% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 12.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 73.7% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 53.4% |
Multimodal Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Claude 3 Opus: 27.1 (#116), Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 36.8 (#77)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1023 | 1161 |
| Video-MME | — | 75% |
Multilingual Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Claude 3 Opus: 41.4 (#207), Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 45.3 (#174)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1258 | 1312 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1248 | 1331 |
| LMArena French | 1275 | 1302 |
| LMArena German | 1258 | 1286 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1204 | 1292 |
| LMArena Korean | 1187 | 1298 |
| LMArena Russian | 1280 | 1320 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1246 | 1311 |
Instruction Following Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Claude 3 Opus: 64.1 (#228), Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 68.6 (#185)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1248 | 1297 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 63.9% | — |
| IFEval | — | 83.7% |
Long Context Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Claude 3 Opus: 38.2 (#202), Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 39.8 (#169)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1259 | 1308 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Claude 3 Opus: 47.2 (#213), Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 52.4 (#172)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1262 | 1319 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 1333 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1296 |
| WildBench | — | 81.3% |
| LiveBench Language | 50.4% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3 Opus better than Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024)?
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.1 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 3 Opus or Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) better for coding?
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.2 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Opus and Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) share?
33 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Opus has 46 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) has 45.