Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3 Opus vs Dolly 2.0-12b

Claude 3 Opus is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.5 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Opus Anthropic

29.5

Rank #310 Confirmed

Dolly 2.0-12b Databricks

25.5

Rank #342 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Opus scores higher in 4 categories and Dolly 2.0-12b in 2 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Claude 3 Opus leads 47.2 to 15.2.
  • Dolly 2.0-12b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3 OpusDolly 2.0-12b
ProviderAnthropicDatabricks
Noometry Index29.525.5
Released2024-02-292023-04-11
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked4617

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude 3 Opus leads

Claude 3 Opus: 32.9 (#267), Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.4 (#332)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusDolly 2.0-12b
LMArena Coding1264776
WeirdML19.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct45.5%—
LiveBench Coding38.6%—
BigCodeBench Complete57.4%—
HumanEval+77.4%—
MBPP+73.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 24.6 (#116), Dolly 2.0-12b: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusDolly 2.0-12b
Cybench10%—
METR Time Horizons29.5%—

Reasoning Too close to call

Claude 3 Opus: 14.6 (#324), Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#316)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusDolly 2.0-12b
LMArena Hard Prompts1245804
Epoch Capabilities Index126.9189.67
WinoGrande88.5%61.8%
SimpleBench23.5%—
Chess Puzzles5%—
EnigmaEval0.8%—
LiveBench Reasoning40.6%—
DTBench61.6%—
LiveBench Data Analysis57.9%—
LMCA17%—
ForecastBench58.4—
HellaSwag—70.8%
LiveBench49.2%—
PIQA—75.4%

Math Dolly 2.0-12b leads

Claude 3 Opus: 14.8 (#299), Dolly 2.0-12b: 27.3 (#251)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusDolly 2.0-12b
LMArena Math1273871
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.7%—
LiveBench Math43.6%—
MATH Level 537.5%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 24.5 (#267), Dolly 2.0-12b: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusDolly 2.0-12b
MMLU84.6%26.2%
GPQA Diamond47.2%—
SimpleQA Verified12.6%—
Confabulations22.7%—
LMArena Expert1223—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—39.6%
BoolQ—56.3%
OpenBookQA—39.2%

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 27.1 (#116), Dolly 2.0-12b: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusDolly 2.0-12b
LMArena Vision1023—

Multilingual Claude 3 Opus leads

Claude 3 Opus: 41.4 (#207), Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#296)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusDolly 2.0-12b
LMArena Non-English1258836
LMArena Chinese1248836
LMArena French1275—
LMArena German1258—
LMArena Japanese1204—
LMArena Korean1187—
LMArena Russian1280—
LMArena Spanish1246—

Instruction Following Claude 3 Opus leads

Claude 3 Opus: 64.1 (#228), Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.7 (#304)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusDolly 2.0-12b
LMArena Instruction Following1248814
LiveBench Instruction Following63.9%—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 38.2 (#202), Dolly 2.0-12b: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusDolly 2.0-12b
LMArena Longer Query1259—

Writing & Preference Claude 3 Opus leads

Claude 3 Opus: 47.2 (#213), Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.2 (#311)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusDolly 2.0-12b
LMArena Text1262851
LMArena Creative Writing1235864
LMArena Multi-Turn1275740
LiveBench Language50.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Opus better than Dolly 2.0-12b?

Claude 3 Opus is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.5 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Opus or Dolly 2.0-12b better for coding?

Claude 3 Opus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.9 versus 23.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Opus and Dolly 2.0-12b share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Opus has 46 scored results on Noometry and Dolly 2.0-12b has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper