Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3 Haiku vs Qwen3 Coder Next

Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.3 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Haiku Anthropic

25.9

Rank #340 Confirmed

Qwen3 Coder Next Alibaba (Qwen)

34.3

Rank #232 Reported

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Claude 3 Haiku scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3 Coder Next in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen3 Coder Next leads 36.3 to 26.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is WeirdML: 9.8% for Claude 3 Haiku and 34.4% for Qwen3 Coder Next.
  • Qwen3 Coder Next has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3 HaikuQwen3 Coder Next
ProviderAnthropicAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index25.934.3
Released2024-03-072026-02-02
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.12
Output $ / M tokens—$0.80
Results tracked373

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3 Coder Next leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 26.4 (#325), Qwen3 Coder Next: 36.3 (#210)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3 Coder Next
WeirdML9.8%34.4%
SciCode—32.3%
BigCodeBench Instruct39.4%—
LMArena Coding1199—
BigCodeBench Complete50.1%—
CadEval12%—
HumanEval+68.9%—
MBPP+68.8%—

Reasoning Qwen3 Coder Next leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 16.3 (#307), Qwen3 Coder Next: 22.4 (#196)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3 Coder Next
Kagi LLM Benchmark34.2%—
CritPt—0%
LMArena Hard Prompts1174—
DTBench50.1%—
LMCA8.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index118.35—
ForecastBench53.2—
WinoGrande74.2%—

Math Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 9.8 (#319), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3 Coder Next
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.8%—
LMArena Math1188—
MATH Level 514.9%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 17.3 (#285), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3 Coder Next
GPQA Diamond36.3%—
Confabulations34.2%—
LMArena Expert1148—
MMLU73.8%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 23.6 (#128), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Vision950—
ScienceQA72%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 36.0 (#243), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Non-English1178—
LMArena Chinese1155—
LMArena French1195—
LMArena German1174—
LMArena Japanese1102—
LMArena Korean1109—
LMArena Russian1204—
LMArena Spanish1166—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 61.3 (#247), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Instruction Following1173—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 36.1 (#237), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Longer Query1190—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 29.7 (#291), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Text1195—
LMArena Creative Writing1157—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing717—
LMArena Multi-Turn1190—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Haiku better than Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.3 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Haiku or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?

Qwen3 Coder Next scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.3 versus 26.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Haiku and Qwen3 Coder Next share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Claude 3 Haiku has 37 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper