Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3 Haiku vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Haiku Anthropic

25.7

Rank #333 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Flash Alibaba (Qwen)

39.5

Rank #152 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Haiku scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Flash in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 48.9 to 17.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.8% for Claude 3 Haiku and 86.7% for Qwen3.7 Flash.

Side by side

Claude 3 HaikuQwen3.7 Flash
ProviderAnthropicAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index25.739.5
Released2024-03-072026-07-15
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.03
Output $ / M tokens—$0.13
Results tracked377

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 26.1 (#320), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3.7 Flash
WeirdML9.8%—
BigCodeBench Instruct39.4%—
LMArena Coding1199—
BigCodeBench Complete50.1%—
CadEval12%—
HumanEval+68.9%—
MBPP+68.8%—

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Flash leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 15.7 (#303), Qwen3.7 Flash: 27.3 (#108)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3.7 Flash
Epoch Capabilities Index118.3144.62
Kagi LLM Benchmark34.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)—43.8%
Chess Puzzles—23%
LMArena Hard Prompts1174—
Mystery Game Puzzles—15%
DTBench50.1%—
LMCA8.8%—
ForecastBench53.2—
WinoGrande74.2%—

Math Qwen3.7 Flash leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 9.2 (#313), Qwen3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#100)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3.7 Flash
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.8%86.7%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—19.3%
LMArena Math1188—
MATH Level 514.9%—

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Flash leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 17.3 (#280), Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#69)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3.7 Flash
GPQA Diamond36.3%82.3%
Confabulations34.2%—
LMArena Expert1148—
MMLU73.8%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 23.1 (#123), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Vision950—
ScienceQA72%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 36.1 (#238), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Non-English1178—
LMArena Chinese1155—
LMArena French1194—
LMArena German1174—
LMArena Japanese1102—
LMArena Korean1108—
LMArena Russian1204—
LMArena Spanish1165—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 61.5 (#242), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following1174—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 36.1 (#232), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Longer Query1191—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 29.8 (#286), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Text1195—
LMArena Creative Writing1157—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing717—
LMArena Multi-Turn1190—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Haiku better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Haiku and Qwen3.7 Flash share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Haiku has 37 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper