Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3 Haiku vs Qwen3 14B

Qwen3 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.5 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Haiku Anthropic

25.9

Rank #340 Confirmed

Qwen3 14B Alibaba (Qwen)

35.5

Rank #225 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Haiku scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3 14B in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3 14B leads 38.6 to 9.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.8% for Claude 3 Haiku and 66.4% for Qwen3 14B.
  • Qwen3 14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3 HaikuQwen3 14B
ProviderAnthropicAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index25.935.5
Released2024-03-072025-04
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.35
Output $ / M tokens—$1.40
Results tracked3712

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3 14B leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 26.4 (#325), Qwen3 14B: 37.3 (#195)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3 14B
SciCode—31.6%
WeirdML9.8%—
BigCodeBench Instruct39.4%—
LMArena Coding1199—
BigCodeBench Complete50.1%—
CadEval12%—
HumanEval+68.9%—
MBPP+68.8%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: —, Qwen3 14B: 29.6 (#83)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3 14B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—41%

Reasoning Qwen3 14B leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 16.3 (#307), Qwen3 14B: 18.5 (#280)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3 14B
Kagi LLM Benchmark34.2%49.1%
DTBench50.1%64%
LMCA8.8%18.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index118.35138.23
CritPt—0%
Chess Puzzles—4%
LMArena Hard Prompts1174—
ForecastBench53.2—
WinoGrande74.2%—

Math Qwen3 14B leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 9.8 (#319), Qwen3 14B: 38.6 (#133)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3 14B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.8%66.4%
LMArena Math1188—
MATH Level 514.9%—

Knowledge Qwen3 14B leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 17.3 (#285), Qwen3 14B: 39.3 (#134)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3 14B
GPQA Diamond36.3%63.8%
Confabulations34.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.4%
LMArena Expert1148—
MMLU73.8%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 23.6 (#128), Qwen3 14B: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3 14B
LMArena Vision950—
ScienceQA72%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 36.0 (#243), Qwen3 14B: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3 14B
LMArena Non-English1178—
LMArena Chinese1155—
LMArena French1195—
LMArena German1174—
LMArena Japanese1102—
LMArena Korean1109—
LMArena Russian1204—
LMArena Spanish1166—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 61.3 (#247), Qwen3 14B: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3 14B
LMArena Instruction Following1173—

Long Context Qwen3 14B leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 36.1 (#237), Qwen3 14B: 38.1 (#204)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3 14B
Fiction.LiveBench—62.5%
LMArena Longer Query1190—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 29.7 (#291), Qwen3 14B: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3 14B
LMArena Text1195—
LMArena Creative Writing1157—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing717—
LMArena Multi-Turn1190—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Haiku better than Qwen3 14B?

Qwen3 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.5 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Haiku or Qwen3 14B better for coding?

Qwen3 14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.3 versus 26.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Haiku and Qwen3 14B share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Haiku has 37 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 14B has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper