Model comparison

Claude 3 Haiku vs phi-3-medium 14B

phi-3-medium 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.7 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Haiku Anthropic

25.9

Rank #340 Confirmed

phi-3-medium 14B Microsoft

29.7

Rank #306 Reported

Summary

  • They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Haiku scores higher in 1 category and phi-3-medium 14B in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where phi-3-medium 14B leads 27.3 to 9.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 36.3% for Claude 3 Haiku and 27.6% for phi-3-medium 14B.
  • phi-3-medium 14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3 Haiku and phi-3-medium 14B specifications
Claude 3 Haikuphi-3-medium 14B
ProviderAnthropicMicrosoft
Noometry Index25.929.7
Released2024-03-072024-04-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3713

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding phi-3-medium 14B leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 26.4 (#325), phi-3-medium 14B: 36.8 (#201)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 Haikuphi-3-medium 14B
BigCodeBench Instruct39.4%37.6%
BigCodeBench Complete50.1%48.7%
WeirdML9.8%—
LMArena Coding1199—
CadEval12%—
HumanEval+68.9%—
MBPP+68.8%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 16.3 (#307), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 Haikuphi-3-medium 14B
Epoch Capabilities Index118.35121.23
WinoGrande74.2%81.5%
Kagi LLM Benchmark34.2%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1174—
DTBench50.1%—
LMCA8.8%—
Adversarial NLI—55.8%
BIG-Bench Hard—81.4%
ForecastBench53.2—
HellaSwag—82.4%

Math phi-3-medium 14B leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 9.8 (#319), phi-3-medium 14B: 27.3 (#250)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 Haikuphi-3-medium 14B
MATH Level 514.9%17.6%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.8%—
LMArena Math1188—

Knowledge Claude 3 Haiku leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 17.3 (#285), phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#306)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 Haikuphi-3-medium 14B
GPQA Diamond36.3%27.6%
MMLU73.8%78%
Confabulations34.2%—
LMArena Expert1148—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—91.6%
OpenBookQA—87.4%
TriviaQA—73.9%

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 23.6 (#128), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 Haikuphi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Vision950—
ScienceQA72%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 36.0 (#243), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 Haikuphi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Non-English1178—
LMArena Chinese1155—
LMArena French1195—
LMArena German1174—
LMArena Japanese1102—
LMArena Korean1109—
LMArena Russian1204—
LMArena Spanish1166—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 61.3 (#247), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 Haikuphi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Instruction Following1173—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 36.1 (#237), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 Haikuphi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Longer Query1190—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 29.7 (#291), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 Haikuphi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Text1195—
LMArena Creative Writing1157—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing717—
LMArena Multi-Turn1190—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Haiku better than phi-3-medium 14B?

phi-3-medium 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.7 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Haiku or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?

phi-3-medium 14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.8 versus 26.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Haiku and phi-3-medium 14B share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Haiku has 37 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper