Model comparison

Claude 3 Haiku vs Phi-1.5

Claude 3 Haiku has enough public results to be ranked (#340); Phi-1.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Haiku Anthropic

25.9

Rank #340 Confirmed

Phi-1.5 Microsoft

—

Unranked

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both.
  • Phi-1.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3 Haiku and Phi-1.5 specifications
Claude 3 HaikuPhi-1.5
ProviderAnthropicMicrosoft
Noometry Index25.9—
Released2024-03-072023-09-11
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked377

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 26.4 (#325), Phi-1.5: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuPhi-1.5
WeirdML9.8%—
BigCodeBench Instruct39.4%—
LMArena Coding1199—
BigCodeBench Complete50.1%—
CadEval12%—
HumanEval+68.9%—
MBPP+68.8%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 16.3 (#307), Phi-1.5: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuPhi-1.5
Epoch Capabilities Index118.3591.53
WinoGrande74.2%73.4%
Kagi LLM Benchmark34.2%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1174—
DTBench50.1%—
LMCA8.8%—
ForecastBench53.2—
HellaSwag—47.6%

Math Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 9.8 (#319), Phi-1.5: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuPhi-1.5
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.8%—
LMArena Math1188—
MATH Level 514.9%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 17.3 (#285), Phi-1.5: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuPhi-1.5
MMLU73.8%37.6%
GPQA Diamond36.3%—
Confabulations34.2%—
LMArena Expert1148—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—44.4%
BoolQ—75.8%
OpenBookQA—37.2%

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 23.6 (#128), Phi-1.5: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuPhi-1.5
LMArena Vision950—
ScienceQA72%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 36.0 (#243), Phi-1.5: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuPhi-1.5
LMArena Non-English1178—
LMArena Chinese1155—
LMArena French1195—
LMArena German1174—
LMArena Japanese1102—
LMArena Korean1109—
LMArena Russian1204—
LMArena Spanish1166—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 61.3 (#247), Phi-1.5: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuPhi-1.5
LMArena Instruction Following1173—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 36.1 (#237), Phi-1.5: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuPhi-1.5
LMArena Longer Query1190—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 29.7 (#291), Phi-1.5: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuPhi-1.5
LMArena Text1195—
LMArena Creative Writing1157—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing717—
LMArena Multi-Turn1190—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Haiku better than Phi-1.5?

Claude 3 Haiku has enough public results to be ranked (#340); Phi-1.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Haiku and Phi-1.5 share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Haiku has 37 scored results on Noometry and Phi-1.5 has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper