Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3 Haiku vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Haiku Anthropic

25.9

Rank #340 Confirmed

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)

39.4

Rank #168 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Haiku scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads 36.3 to 9.8.
  • Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3 HaikuOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
ProviderAnthropicAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index25.939.4
Released2024-03-07—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3716

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 26.4 (#325), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Coding11991347
WeirdML9.8%—
BigCodeBench Instruct39.4%—
BigCodeBench Complete50.1%—
CadEval12%—
HumanEval+68.9%—
MBPP+68.8%—

Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 16.3 (#307), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts11741322
Kagi LLM Benchmark34.2%—
DTBench50.1%—
LMCA8.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index118.35—
ForecastBench53.2—
WinoGrande74.2%—

Math Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 9.8 (#319), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Math11881305
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.8%—
MATH Level 514.9%—

Knowledge Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 17.3 (#285), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Expert11481308
GPQA Diamond36.3%—
Confabulations34.2%—
MMLU73.8%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 23.6 (#128), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Vision950—
ScienceQA72%—

Multilingual Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 36.0 (#243), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Non-English11781275
LMArena Chinese11551304
LMArena French11951328
LMArena German11741282
LMArena Korean11091206
LMArena Russian12041268
LMArena Spanish11661336
LMArena Japanese1102—

Instruction Following Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 61.3 (#247), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following11731299

Long Context Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 36.1 (#237), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query11901312

Writing & Preference Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 29.7 (#291), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Text11951311
LMArena Creative Writing11571264
LMArena Multi-Turn11901309
EQ-Bench Creative Writing717—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Haiku better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Haiku or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 26.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Haiku and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Haiku has 37 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper