Model comparison
Claude 3 Haiku vs Muse Glimmer
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Haiku scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Glimmer in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Muse Glimmer leads 38.8 to 9.8.
- Muse Glimmer has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 3 Haiku | Muse Glimmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 25.9 | 41.7 |
| Released | 2024-03-07 | 2026-08-10 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 37 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Glimmer leads
Claude 3 Haiku: 26.4 (#325), Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1199 | 1416 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1355 |
| SciCode | — | 44.9% |
| WeirdML | 9.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 39.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 50.1% | — |
| CadEval | 12% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 68.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 68.8% | — |
Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads
Claude 3 Haiku: 16.3 (#307), Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1174 | 1396 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 34.2% | — |
| CritPt | — | 2.6% |
| DTBench | 50.1% | — |
| LMCA | 8.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.35 | — |
| ForecastBench | 53.2 | — |
| WinoGrande | 74.2% | — |
Math Muse Glimmer leads
Claude 3 Haiku: 9.8 (#319), Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1188 | 1417 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 14.9% | — |
Knowledge Muse Glimmer leads
Claude 3 Haiku: 17.3 (#285), Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1148 | 1386 |
| GPQA Diamond | 36.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 34.2% | — |
| MMLU | 73.8% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 3 Haiku: 23.6 (#128), Muse Glimmer: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 950 | — |
| ScienceQA | 72% | — |
Multilingual Muse Glimmer leads
Claude 3 Haiku: 36.0 (#243), Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1178 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1155 | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | 1204 | 1390 |
| LMArena French | 1195 | — |
| LMArena German | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1102 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1109 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1166 | — |
Instruction Following Muse Glimmer leads
Claude 3 Haiku: 61.3 (#247), Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1173 | 1375 |
Long Context Muse Glimmer leads
Claude 3 Haiku: 36.1 (#237), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1190 | 1382 |
Writing & Preference Muse Glimmer leads
Claude 3 Haiku: 29.7 (#291), Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1195 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1157 | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1190 | 1399 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 717 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3 Haiku better than Muse Glimmer?
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 3 Haiku or Muse Glimmer better for coding?
Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 26.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Haiku and Muse Glimmer share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Haiku has 37 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.