Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3 Haiku vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Haiku Anthropic

25.9

Rank #340 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.6-Flash Xiaomi

48.5

Rank #55 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Haiku scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 51.9 to 9.8.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3 HaikuMiMo-V2.6-Flash
ProviderAnthropicXiaomi
Noometry Index25.948.5
Released2024-03-072026-09-21
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.14
Output $ / M tokens—$0.28
Results tracked3719

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 26.4 (#325), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Coding11991504
LMArena WebDev—1637
SciCode—51.3%
WeirdML9.8%—
BigCodeBench Instruct39.4%—
BigCodeBench Complete50.1%—
CadEval12%—
HumanEval+68.9%—
MBPP+68.8%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 16.3 (#307), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts11741482
Kagi LLM Benchmark34.2%—
CritPt—12%
DTBench50.1%—
LMCA8.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index118.35—
ForecastBench53.2—
WinoGrande74.2%—

Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 9.8 (#319), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Math11881468
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.8%—
ProofBench—63%
MATH Level 514.9%—

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 17.3 (#285), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Expert11481501
GPQA Diamond36.3%—
Confabulations34.2%—
MMLU73.8%—

Multimodal MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 23.6 (#128), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Vision9501259
ScienceQA72%—

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 36.0 (#243), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Non-English11781434
LMArena Chinese11551511
LMArena French11951475
LMArena Russian12041409
LMArena Spanish11661456
LMArena German1174—
LMArena Japanese1102—
LMArena Korean1109—

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 61.3 (#247), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following11731463

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 36.1 (#237), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Longer Query11901463

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 29.7 (#291), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text11951455
LMArena Creative Writing11571400
LMArena Multi-Turn11901451
EQ-Bench Creative Writing717—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Haiku better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Haiku or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 26.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Haiku and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Haiku has 37 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper