Model comparison

Claude 3 Haiku vs Mercury

Mercury is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Haiku Anthropic

25.9

Rank #340 Confirmed

Mercury Inception

37.6

Rank #199 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Haiku scores higher in 0 categories and Mercury in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mercury leads 46.2 to 29.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 34.2% for Claude 3 Haiku and 21.6% for Mercury.

Side by side

Claude 3 Haiku and Mercury specifications
Claude 3 HaikuMercury
ProviderAnthropicInception
Noometry Index25.937.6
Released2024-03-07—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked379

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mercury leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 26.4 (#325), Mercury: 38.7 (#170)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMercury
LMArena Coding11991322
WeirdML9.8%—
BigCodeBench Instruct39.4%—
BigCodeBench Complete50.1%—
CadEval12%—
HumanEval+68.9%—
MBPP+68.8%—

Reasoning Mercury leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 16.3 (#307), Mercury: 17.5 (#293)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMercury
Kagi LLM Benchmark34.2%21.6%
LMArena Hard Prompts11741285
DTBench50.1%—
LMCA8.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index118.35—
ForecastBench53.2—
WinoGrande74.2%—

Math Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 9.8 (#319), Mercury: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMercury
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.8%—
LMArena Math1188—
MATH Level 514.9%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 17.3 (#285), Mercury: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMercury
GPQA Diamond36.3%—
Confabulations34.2%—
LMArena Expert1148—
MMLU73.8%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 23.6 (#128), Mercury: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMercury
LMArena Vision950—
ScienceQA72%—

Multilingual Mercury leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 36.0 (#243), Mercury: 41.6 (#206)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMercury
LMArena Non-English11781260
LMArena Chinese1155—
LMArena French1195—
LMArena German1174—
LMArena Japanese1102—
LMArena Korean1109—
LMArena Russian1204—
LMArena Spanish1166—

Instruction Following Mercury leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 61.3 (#247), Mercury: 65.2 (#224)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMercury
LMArena Instruction Following11731239

Long Context Mercury leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 36.1 (#237), Mercury: 38.4 (#198)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMercury
LMArena Longer Query11901266

Writing & Preference Mercury leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 29.7 (#291), Mercury: 46.2 (#221)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMercury
LMArena Text11951282
LMArena Creative Writing11571191
LMArena Multi-Turn11901282
EQ-Bench Creative Writing717—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Haiku better than Mercury?

Mercury is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Haiku or Mercury better for coding?

Mercury scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.7 versus 26.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Haiku and Mercury share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Haiku has 37 scored results on Noometry and Mercury has 9.

Related comparisons

Go deeper