Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3 Haiku vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Haiku Anthropic

25.9

Rank #340 Confirmed

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent xAI

46.2

Rank #65 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Haiku scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads 64.0 to 29.7.

Side by side

Claude 3 HaikuGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
ProviderAnthropicxAI
Noometry Index25.946.2
Released2024-03-072026-03-09
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—30K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.25
Output $ / M tokens—$2.50
Results tracked3720

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 26.4 (#325), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.0 (#92)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Coding11991457
WeirdML9.8%—
BigCodeBench Instruct39.4%—
BigCodeBench Complete50.1%—
CadEval12%—
HumanEval+68.9%—
MBPP+68.8%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: —, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Search—1204

Reasoning Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 16.3 (#307), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.9 (#48)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Hard Prompts11741448
Kagi LLM Benchmark34.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)—89.6%
DTBench50.1%—
LMCA8.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index118.35—
ForecastBench53.2—
WinoGrande74.2%—

Math Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 9.8 (#319), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.4 (#104)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Math11881442
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.8%—
MATH Level 514.9%—

Knowledge Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 17.3 (#285), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.4 (#119)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Expert11481445
GPQA Diamond36.3%—
Confabulations34.2%—
MMLU73.8%—

Multimodal Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 23.6 (#128), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.5 (#48)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Vision9501259
ScienceQA72%—

Multilingual Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 36.0 (#243), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 54.4 (#43)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Non-English11781440
LMArena Chinese11551475
LMArena French11951466
LMArena German11741456
LMArena Japanese11021405
LMArena Korean11091416
LMArena Russian12041457
LMArena Spanish11661447

Instruction Following Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 61.3 (#247), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 74.8 (#84)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Instruction Following11731420

Long Context Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 36.1 (#237), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.7 (#88)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Longer Query11901431

Writing & Preference Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 29.7 (#291), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 64.0 (#59)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Text11951450
LMArena Creative Writing11571436
LMArena Multi-Turn11901452
EQ-Bench Creative Writing717—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Haiku better than Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Haiku or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent better for coding?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 26.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Haiku and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Haiku has 37 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has 20.

Related comparisons

Go deeper