Model comparison
Claude 3 Haiku vs Gemma 3 1B
Claude 3 Haiku is the stronger model overall, scoring 25.7 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Haiku scores higher in 1 category and Gemma 3 1B in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Claude 3 Haiku leads 17.3 to 7.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 36.3% for Claude 3 Haiku and 19.9% for Gemma 3 1B.
- Gemma 3 1B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 3 Haiku | Gemma 3 1B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Noometry Index | 25.7 | 20.7 |
| Released | 2024-03-07 | 2025-03-12 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 37 | 4 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Claude 3 Haiku: 26.1 (#320), Gemma 3 1B: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 9.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 39.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1199 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 50.1% | — |
| CadEval | 12% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 68.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 68.8% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude 3 Haiku: —, Gemma 3 1B: 13.5 (#144)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 7.2% |
Reasoning Gemma 3 1B leads
Claude 3 Haiku: 15.7 (#303), Gemma 3 1B: 18.5 (#260)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 34.2% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1174 | — |
| DTBench | 50.1% | — |
| LMCA | 8.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.3 | — |
| ForecastBench | 53.2 | — |
| WinoGrande | 74.2% | — |
Math Too close to call
Claude 3 Haiku: 9.2 (#313), Gemma 3 1B: 9.6 (#310)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.8% | 1.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1188 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 14.9% | — |
Knowledge Claude 3 Haiku leads
Claude 3 Haiku: 17.3 (#280), Gemma 3 1B: 7.1 (#309)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 36.3% | 19.9% |
| Confabulations | 34.2% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1148 | — |
| MMLU | 73.8% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 3 Haiku: 23.1 (#123), Gemma 3 1B: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 950 | — |
| ScienceQA | 72% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 3 Haiku: 36.1 (#238), Gemma 3 1B: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1178 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1155 | — |
| LMArena French | 1194 | — |
| LMArena German | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1102 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1108 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1204 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1165 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 3 Haiku: 61.5 (#242), Gemma 3 1B: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1174 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 3 Haiku: 36.1 (#232), Gemma 3 1B: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1191 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 3 Haiku: 29.8 (#286), Gemma 3 1B: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1195 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1157 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 717 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1190 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3 Haiku better than Gemma 3 1B?
Claude 3 Haiku is the stronger model overall, scoring 25.7 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Haiku and Gemma 3 1B share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Haiku has 37 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3 1B has 4.