Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3 Haiku vs Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Haiku Anthropic

25.7

Rank #333 Confirmed

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite Google

37.3

Rank #189 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Haiku scores higher in 0 categories and Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads 31.8 to 9.2.

Side by side

Claude 3 HaikuGemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Noometry Index25.737.3
Released2024-03-072025-02-05
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3732

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 26.1 (#320), Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.4 (#181)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
LMArena Coding11991322
WeirdML9.8%—
BigCodeBench Instruct39.4%—
LiveBench Coding—47.1%
BigCodeBench Complete50.1%—
CadEval12%—
HumanEval+68.9%—
MBPP+68.8%—

Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 15.7 (#303), Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 21.2 (#203)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
LMArena Hard Prompts11741324
DTBench50.1%52.5%
ForecastBench53.257.1
Kagi LLM Benchmark34.2%—
LiveBench Reasoning—50.1%
LiveBench Data Analysis—65.5%
LMCA8.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index118.3—
LiveBench—54.3%
WinoGrande74.2%—

Math Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 9.2 (#313), Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.8 (#192)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
LMArena Math11881309
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.8%—
Omni-MATH—37.4%
LiveBench Math—58.1%
MATH Level 514.9%—

Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 17.3 (#280), Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.6 (#185)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
LMArena Expert11481305
GPQA Diamond36.3%—
MMLU-Pro—72%
Confabulations34.2%—
GPQA (HELM)—50%
MMLU73.8%—

Multimodal Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 23.1 (#123), Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 30.6 (#103)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
LMArena Vision9501100
ScienceQA72%—

Multilingual Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 36.1 (#238), Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.2 (#156)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
LMArena Non-English11781323
LMArena Chinese11551339
LMArena French11941346
LMArena German11741306
LMArena Japanese11021302
LMArena Korean11081325
LMArena Russian12041328
LMArena Spanish11651313

Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 61.5 (#242), Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.6 (#158)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
LMArena Instruction Following11741305
LiveBench Instruction Following—78.3%
IFEval—82.4%

Long Context Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 36.1 (#232), Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#155)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
LMArena Longer Query11911321

Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 29.8 (#286), Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.9 (#172)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
LMArena Text11951330
LMArena Creative Writing11571319
LMArena Multi-Turn11901307
EQ-Bench Creative Writing717—
WildBench—79%
LiveBench Language—34.3%

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Haiku better than Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite?

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Haiku or Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.4 versus 26.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Haiku and Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Haiku has 37 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper