Model comparison
Claude 3 Haiku vs Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.3 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 27 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 27 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Haiku scores higher in 0 categories and Claude Opus 4.6 in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Claude Opus 4.6 leads 62.7 to 9.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.8% for Claude 3 Haiku and 94.4% for Claude Opus 4.6.
Side by side
| Claude 3 Haiku | Claude Opus 4.6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Anthropic |
| Noometry Index | 25.7 | 58.3 |
| Released | 2024-03-07 | 2026-02-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $5 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $25 |
| Results tracked | 37 | 68 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Opus 4.6 leads
Claude 3 Haiku: 26.1 (#320), Claude Opus 4.6: 57.7 (#15)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Claude Opus 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 9.8% | 78% |
| LMArena Coding | 1199 | 1535 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 78.7% |
| FrontierCode | — | 26.6% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 75.6% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1546 |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | — | 72% |
| GSO | — | 41.2% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 39.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 50.1% | — |
| CadEval | 12% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 996.5 |
| AlgoTune | — | 1.47 |
| HumanEval+ | 68.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 68.8% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude 3 Haiku: —, Claude Opus 4.6: 51.0 (#4)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Claude Opus 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 79.8% |
| APEX-Agents | — | 46.3% |
| Remote Labor Index | — | 4.2% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 27.3% |
| Cybench | — | 93% |
| DeepResearch Bench | — | 55.3% |
| GBAEval | — | 44.1% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1253 |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 78.9% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 8,018 |
Reasoning Claude Opus 4.6 leads
Claude 3 Haiku: 15.7 (#303), Claude Opus 4.6: 57.7 (#21)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Claude Opus 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 34.2% | 83.6% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1174 | 1527 |
| DTBench | 50.1% | 91.2% |
| LMCA | 8.8% | 55.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.3 | 155.36 |
| ForecastBench | 53.2 | 60 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 69.2% |
| SimpleBench | — | 67.6% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 92.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 94% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 17% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 7.6% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 80.6% |
| EBR-Bench | — | 12.7% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 25% |
| WinoGrande | 74.2% | — |
Math Claude Opus 4.6 leads
Claude 3 Haiku: 9.2 (#313), Claude Opus 4.6: 62.7 (#25)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Claude Opus 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.8% | 94.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1188 | 1517 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 66% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 26.8% |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 78.5% |
| ProofBench | — | 50% |
| MATH Level 5 | 14.9% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 40.7% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 22.9% |
Knowledge Claude Opus 4.6 leads
Claude 3 Haiku: 17.3 (#280), Claude Opus 4.6: 61.8 (#23)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Claude Opus 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 36.3% | 90.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1148 | 1546 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 34.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 47% |
| Confabulations | 34.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 12.2% |
| MMLU | 73.8% | — |
Multimodal Claude Opus 4.6 leads
Claude 3 Haiku: 23.1 (#123), Claude Opus 4.6: 37.0 (#67)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Claude Opus 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 950 | 1316 |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 28.3% |
| LMArena Document | — | 1507 |
| ScienceQA | 72% | — |
Multilingual Claude Opus 4.6 leads
Claude 3 Haiku: 36.1 (#238), Claude Opus 4.6: 58.2 (#4)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Claude Opus 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1178 | 1490 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1155 | 1551 |
| LMArena French | 1194 | 1513 |
| LMArena German | 1174 | 1504 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1102 | 1484 |
| LMArena Korean | 1108 | 1465 |
| LMArena Russian | 1204 | 1497 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1165 | 1512 |
Instruction Following Claude Opus 4.6 leads
Claude 3 Haiku: 61.5 (#242), Claude Opus 4.6: 79.7 (#3)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Claude Opus 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1174 | 1523 |
Long Context Claude Opus 4.6 leads
Claude 3 Haiku: 36.1 (#232), Claude Opus 4.6: 48.1 (#13)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Claude Opus 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1191 | 1520 |
| CL-bench | — | 20.7% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 17% |
Writing & Preference Claude Opus 4.6 leads
Claude 3 Haiku: 29.8 (#286), Claude Opus 4.6: 73.7 (#9)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Claude Opus 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1195 | 1504 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1157 | 1506 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 717 | 1809 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1190 | 1514 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1223 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3 Haiku better than Claude Opus 4.6?
Claude Opus 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.3 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 3 Haiku or Claude Opus 4.6 better for coding?
Claude Opus 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 57.7 versus 26.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Haiku and Claude Opus 4.6 share?
27 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Haiku has 37 scored results on Noometry and Claude Opus 4.6 has 68.