Model comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Olmo 7b Instruct
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores higher in 5 categories and Olmo 7b Instruct in 1 category; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads 54.4 to 25.8.
- Olmo 7b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Olmo 7b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 39.5 | 30.3 |
| Released | 2025-02-24 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 58 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 40.6 (#136), Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1361 | 1016 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 61% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 52.8% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 64.9% | — |
| GSO | 3.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 74.5% | — |
| CadEval | 54% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 34.1 (#50), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 30.9% | — |
| Cybench | 20% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 43.6% | — |
| OSWorld | 35.8% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 60% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 18.6 (#277), Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1333 | 993 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.9% | — |
| SimpleBench | 46.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 28.6% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 4.2% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 87.8% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 74% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.16 | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.8 | — |
| LiveBench | 76.1% | — |
Math Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 37.5 (#153), Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1337 | 1018 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 33% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 79% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 91.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 4.1% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 39.8 (#130), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 79.7% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 78.4% | — |
| Confabulations | 14.7% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 60.8% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1321 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 33.7 (#95), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1169 | — |
| GeoBench | 68% | — |
| VPCT | 39% | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 33.9% | — |
Multilingual Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 44.1 (#179), Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1296 | 977 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1299 | 1014 |
| LMArena Russian | 1311 | 947 |
| LMArena French | 1303 | — |
| LMArena German | 1301 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1267 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1249 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1298 | — |
Instruction Following Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 72.9 (#125), Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1352 | 978 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 81.3% | — |
| IFEval | 83.4% | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 50.3 (#10), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 83.3% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1373 | — |
Writing & Preference Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 54.4 (#150), Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1314 | 1032 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1332 | 990 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1007 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 81.1% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1412 | — |
| WildBench | 81.4% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 59.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet better than Olmo 7b Instruct?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.6 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Olmo 7b Instruct share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has 58 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.