Model comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads 34.1 to 21.9.
Side by side
| Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Amazon |
| Noometry Index | 39.5 | 33.4 |
| Released | 2025-02-24 | 2025-12-02 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 58 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 40.6 (#136), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.8 (#133)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 61% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 52.8% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 64.9% | — |
| SciCode | — | 42.7% |
| GSO | 3.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 74.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1361 | — |
| CadEval | 54% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 34.1 (#50), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#136)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 30.9% | — |
| Cybench | 20% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 43.6% | — |
| OSWorld | 35.8% | — |
| GDP.pdf | — | 2% |
| METR Time Horizons | 60% | — |
Reasoning Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 18.6 (#277), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 22.4 (#194)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.9% | — |
| SimpleBench | 46.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 28.6% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| EnigmaEval | 4.2% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 87.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1333 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 74% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.16 | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.8 | — |
| LiveBench | 76.1% | — |
Math Not comparable
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 37.5 (#153), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 33% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 79% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1337 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 91.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 4.1% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 39.8 (#130), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 79.7% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 78.4% | — |
| Confabulations | 14.7% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 60.8% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1321 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 33.7 (#95), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1169 | — |
| GeoBench | 68% | — |
| VPCT | 39% | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 33.9% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 44.1 (#179), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1296 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1299 | — |
| LMArena French | 1303 | — |
| LMArena German | 1301 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1267 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1249 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1311 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1298 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 72.9 (#125), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 81.3% | — |
| IFEval | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1352 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 50.3 (#10), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 83.3% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1373 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 54.4 (#150), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1314 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1332 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 81.1% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1412 | — |
| WildBench | 81.4% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 59.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet better than Nova 2.0 Pro Preview?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet or Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (40.6 vs 40.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has 58 scored results on Noometry and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3.