Model comparison
Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Phi-4
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.6 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 34 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 34 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores higher in 7 categories and Phi-4 in 2 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads 52.9 to 40.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is LiveBench Coding: 67.1% for Claude 3.5 Sonnet and 30.7% for Phi-4.
- Phi-4 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Phi-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 34.6 | 31.2 |
| Released | 2024-06-20 | 2024-12-11 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 4K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.07 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Results tracked | 60 | 37 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 39.0 (#165), Phi-4: 34.4 (#239)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 46.8% | 45.5% |
| LiveBench Coding | 67.1% | 30.7% |
| LMArena Coding | 1342 | 1231 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 58.6% | 55.4% |
| Aider Polyglot | 51.6% | — |
| GSO | 4.6% | — |
| WeirdML | 40% | — |
| CadEval | 48% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 81.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 74.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 32.3 (#67), Phi-4: 22.8 (#128)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 32.6% | 11.6% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 28.8% |
| TheAgentCompany | 24% | — |
| Cybench | 17.5% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 45.2% | — |
Reasoning Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 23.1 (#183), Phi-4: 17.7 (#291)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 56.7% | 47.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1305 | 1220 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 55% | 45.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.55 | 130.42 |
| LiveBench | 59% | 41.6% |
| SimpleBench | 41.4% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 1% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.9% | — |
| DTBench | 67.8% | — |
| ForecastBench | 60.7 | — |
Math Phi-4 leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 19.2 (#288), Phi-4: 20.8 (#285)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 8.5% | 13.8% |
| LiveBench Math | 52.3% | 42% |
| LMArena Math | 1307 | 1246 |
| MATH Level 5 | 56.9% | 64.9% |
| Omni-MATH | 27.6% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 2.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |
Knowledge Phi-4 leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 28.6 (#245), Phi-4: 32.6 (#209)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 55.3% | 56.1% |
| Confabulations | 19.9% | 29.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1265 | 1203 |
| MMLU | 87.3% | 84.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.1% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 77.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 3.7% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 56.5% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 26.5 (#120), Phi-4: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1125 | — |
| Video-MME | 60% | — |
| GeoBench | 62% | — |
| VPCT | 33% | — |
Multilingual Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 43.2 (#185), Phi-4: 37.2 (#237)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1283 | 1197 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1272 | 1212 |
| LMArena French | 1305 | 1224 |
| LMArena German | 1297 | 1222 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1234 | 1158 |
| LMArena Korean | 1200 | 1151 |
| LMArena Russian | 1306 | 1209 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1290 | 1234 |
Instruction Following Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 68.8 (#182), Phi-4: 60.4 (#251)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 69.3% | 58.4% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1297 | 1201 |
| IFEval | 85.5% | — |
Long Context Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 39.9 (#167), Phi-4: 36.9 (#226)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1311 | 1217 |
Writing & Preference Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 52.9 (#164), Phi-4: 40.5 (#244)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1298 | 1217 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1292 | 1182 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 80.3% | 62.6% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1326 | 1206 |
| LiveBench Language | 53.8% | 25.6% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1451 | — |
| WildBench | 79.2% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet better than Phi-4?
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.6 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Phi-4 better for coding?
Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.0 versus 34.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Phi-4 share?
34 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Sonnet has 60 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 has 37.