Model comparison
Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Hunyuan T1 20250711
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 34.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 38.7 to 19.2.
Side by side
| Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 34.6 | 42.5 |
| Released | 2024-06-20 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 60 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 39.0 (#165), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1342 | 1390 |
| Aider Polyglot | 51.6% | — |
| GSO | 4.6% | — |
| WeirdML | 40% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 46.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 67.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 58.6% | — |
| CadEval | 48% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 81.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 74.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 32.3 (#67), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 24% | — |
| Cybench | 17.5% | — |
| BALROG | 32.6% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 45.2% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 23.1 (#183), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1305 | 1399 |
| SimpleBench | 41.4% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 0.9% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 56.7% | — |
| DTBench | 67.8% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 55% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.55 | — |
| ForecastBench | 60.7 | — |
| LiveBench | 59% | — |
Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 19.2 (#288), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1307 | 1414 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 8.5% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 27.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 52.3% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 56.9% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 2.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |
Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 28.6 (#245), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1265 | 1395 |
| GPQA Diamond | 55.3% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.1% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 77.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 19.9% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 56.5% | — |
| MMLU | 87.3% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 26.5 (#120), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1125 | — |
| Video-MME | 60% | — |
| GeoBench | 62% | — |
| VPCT | 33% | — |
Multilingual Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 43.2 (#185), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1283 | 1395 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1272 | 1425 |
| LMArena Korean | 1200 | 1406 |
| LMArena Russian | 1306 | 1385 |
| LMArena French | 1305 | — |
| LMArena German | 1297 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1234 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1290 | — |
Instruction Following Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 68.8 (#182), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1297 | 1374 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 69.3% | — |
| IFEval | 85.5% | — |
Long Context Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 39.9 (#167), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1311 | 1384 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 52.9 (#164), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1298 | 1401 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1292 | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1326 | 1393 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 80.3% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1451 | — |
| WildBench | 79.2% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 53.8% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 34.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 39.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Sonnet has 60 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.