Model comparison
Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Gemma 3 4B
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.6 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores higher in 9 categories and Gemma 3 4B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads 28.6 to 11.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 55.3% for Claude 3.5 Sonnet and 23.2% for Gemma 3 4B.
- Gemma 3 4B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemma 3 4B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Noometry Index | 34.6 | 28.1 |
| Released | 2024-06-20 | 2025-03-12 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 4K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.04 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.08 |
| Results tracked | 60 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 39.0 (#165), Gemma 3 4B: 35.9 (#215)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1342 | 1230 |
| Aider Polyglot | 51.6% | — |
| GSO | 4.6% | — |
| WeirdML | 40% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 46.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 67.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 58.6% | — |
| CadEval | 48% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 81.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 74.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 32.3 (#67), Gemma 3 4B: 20.9 (#142)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 19.6% |
| TheAgentCompany | 24% | — |
| Cybench | 17.5% | — |
| BALROG | 32.6% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 45.2% | — |
Reasoning Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 23.1 (#183), Gemma 3 4B: 13.2 (#335)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1305 | 1253 |
| DTBench | 67.8% | 50.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.55 | 116.02 |
| SimpleBench | 41.4% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 25.2% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.9% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 56.7% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 55% | — |
| LMCA | — | 2.8% |
| ForecastBench | 60.7 | — |
| LiveBench | 59% | — |
Math Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 19.2 (#288), Gemma 3 4B: 16.8 (#292)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 8.5% | 7.5% |
| LMArena Math | 1307 | 1239 |
| Omni-MATH | 27.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 52.3% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 56.9% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 2.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |
Knowledge Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 28.6 (#245), Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#299)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 55.3% | 23.2% |
| LMArena Expert | 1265 | 1223 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.1% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 77.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 19.9% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 6.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 56.5% | — |
| MMLU | 87.3% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 26.5 (#120), Gemma 3 4B: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1125 | — |
| Video-MME | 60% | — |
| GeoBench | 62% | — |
| VPCT | 33% | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 43.2 (#185), Gemma 3 4B: 42.5 (#194)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1283 | 1273 |
| LMArena German | 1297 | 1281 |
| LMArena Russian | 1306 | 1294 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1272 | — |
| LMArena French | 1305 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1234 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1200 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1290 | — |
Instruction Following Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 68.8 (#182), Gemma 3 4B: 65.2 (#225)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1297 | 1239 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 69.3% | — |
| IFEval | 85.5% | — |
Long Context Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 39.9 (#167), Gemma 3 4B: 38.7 (#194)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1311 | 1273 |
Writing & Preference Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 52.9 (#164), Gemma 3 4B: 42.0 (#239)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1298 | 1291 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1292 | 1271 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1451 | 1068 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1326 | 1255 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 80.3% | — |
| WildBench | 79.2% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 53.8% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet better than Gemma 3 4B?
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.6 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Gemma 3 4B better for coding?
Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.0 versus 35.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Gemma 3 4B share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Sonnet has 60 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3 4B has 22.