Model comparison
Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Gemma 2 27B
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.4 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 33 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 33 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores higher in 8 categories and Gemma 2 27B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads 28.5 to 18.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is LiveBench Coding: 67.1% for Claude 3.5 Sonnet and 36% for Gemma 2 27B.
- Gemma 2 27B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemma 2 27B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Noometry Index | 34.4 | 29.2 |
| Released | 2024-06-20 | 2024-06-24 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 8K |
| Max output | — | 2K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.65 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.65 |
| Results tracked | 60 | 34 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 39.5 (#145), Gemma 2 27B: 33.5 (#243)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 46.8% | 42.8% |
| LiveBench Coding | 67.1% | 36% |
| LMArena Coding | 1343 | 1211 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 58.6% | 52.5% |
| Aider Polyglot | 51.6% | — |
| GSO | 4.6% | — |
| WeirdML | 40% | — |
| CadEval | 48% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 81.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 74.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 32.1 (#61), Gemma 2 27B: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 24% | — |
| Cybench | 17.5% | — |
| BALROG | 32.6% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 45.2% | — |
Reasoning Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 22.5 (#176), Gemma 2 27B: 14.8 (#313)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 56.7% | 28.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1305 | 1199 |
| DTBench | 67.8% | 48% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 55% | 47.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.55 | 122.06 |
| LiveBench | 59% | 38.2% |
| SimpleBench | 41.4% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 0.9% | — |
| LMCA | — | 7.1% |
| ForecastBench | 60.7 | — |
Math Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 18.0 (#282), Gemma 2 27B: 10.0 (#306)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 8.5% | 1.4% |
| LiveBench Math | 52.3% | 26.5% |
| LMArena Math | 1306 | 1212 |
| MATH Level 5 | 56.9% | 27.9% |
| Omni-MATH | 27.6% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 2.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |
Knowledge Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 28.5 (#236), Gemma 2 27B: 18.9 (#275)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 55.3% | 36.5% |
| Confabulations | 19.9% | 27.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1264 | 1172 |
| MMLU | 87.3% | 75.7% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.1% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 77.7% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 56.5% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 26.0 (#115), Gemma 2 27B: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1125 | — |
| Video-MME | 60% | — |
| GeoBench | 62% | — |
| VPCT | 33% | — |
Multilingual Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 43.4 (#180), Gemma 2 27B: 38.8 (#221)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1283 | 1217 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1271 | 1221 |
| LMArena French | 1304 | 1246 |
| LMArena German | 1297 | 1209 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1234 | 1175 |
| LMArena Korean | 1200 | 1174 |
| LMArena Russian | 1305 | 1234 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1289 | 1228 |
Instruction Following Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 69.0 (#177), Gemma 2 27B: 60.7 (#244)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 69.3% | 58.1% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1297 | 1206 |
| IFEval | 85.5% | — |
Long Context Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 39.9 (#162), Gemma 2 27B: 37.3 (#213)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1311 | 1231 |
Writing & Preference Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 53.0 (#159), Gemma 2 27B: 44.4 (#220)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1298 | 1231 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1292 | 1241 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1326 | 1224 |
| LiveBench Language | 53.8% | 32.6% |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 80.3% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1451 | — |
| WildBench | 79.2% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet better than Gemma 2 27B?
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.4 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Gemma 2 27B better for coding?
Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 33.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Gemma 2 27B share?
33 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Sonnet has 60 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2 27B has 34.