Model comparison
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Llama 2-13B
Claude 3.5 Haiku and Llama 2-13B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.2 vs 29.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.5 Haiku scores higher in 6 categories and Llama 2-13B in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Llama 2-13B leads 31.1 to 14.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 56.7% for Claude 3.5 Haiku and 42.2% for Llama 2-13B.
- Llama 2-13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 3.5 Haiku | Llama 2-13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 29.2 | 29.6 |
| Released | 2024-10-22 | 2023-07-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 49 | 32 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude 3.5 Haiku leads
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 32.9 (#265), Llama 2-13B: 30.9 (#291)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1286 | 1062 |
| Aider Polyglot | 28% | — |
| SciCode | 27.4% | — |
| WeirdML | 30.7% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 46.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 51.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59% | — |
| CadEval | 32% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 28.0 (#95), Llama 2-13B: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 19.3% | — |
Reasoning Claude 3.5 Haiku leads
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 17.7 (#290), Llama 2-13B: 12.8 (#337)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1251 | 1051 |
| DTBench | 56.7% | 42.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 127.15 | 106.17 |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 28.1% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 48.5% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 58.2% |
| HellaSwag | — | 80.7% |
| LAMBADA | — | 76.5% |
| LiveBench | 43.5% | — |
| PIQA | — | 80.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 72.8% |
Math Llama 2-13B leads
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 14.7 (#300), Llama 2-13B: 31.1 (#229)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1244 | 1065 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.3% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 22.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 35.5% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 46.4% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 0.3% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 36.9% |
Knowledge Llama 2-13B leads
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 18.7 (#281), Llama 2-13B: 28.1 (#249)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1208 | 1030 |
| MMLU | 74.3% | 55.6% |
| GPQA Diamond | 38.1% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 60.5% | — |
| Confabulations | 36.7% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 36.3% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 60.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 82.4% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 57% |
| TriviaQA | — | 79.6% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 26.8 (#117), Llama 2-13B: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1092 | — |
| GeoBench | 34% | — |
| ScienceQA | — | 55.8% |
Multilingual Claude 3.5 Haiku leads
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 40.0 (#218), Llama 2-13B: 26.5 (#279)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1238 | 1024 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1229 | 1001 |
| LMArena French | 1264 | 1044 |
| LMArena German | 1237 | 1009 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1175 | 894 |
| LMArena Korean | 1173 | 953 |
| LMArena Russian | 1253 | 1055 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1261 | 1087 |
Instruction Following Claude 3.5 Haiku leads
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 62.9 (#234), Llama 2-13B: 53.3 (#287)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1241 | 1045 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 61.9% | — |
| IFEval | 79.2% | — |
Long Context Claude 3.5 Haiku leads
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 38.3 (#200), Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#269)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1261 | 1064 |
Writing & Preference Claude 3.5 Haiku leads
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 42.7 (#234), Llama 2-13B: 29.8 (#289)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1255 | 1084 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1233 | 1047 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1265 | 1050 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.5% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1146 | — |
| WildBench | 76% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 35.4% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3.5 Haiku better than Llama 2-13B?
Claude 3.5 Haiku and Llama 2-13B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.2 vs 29.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Claude 3.5 Haiku or Llama 2-13B better for coding?
Claude 3.5 Haiku scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.9 versus 30.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Haiku and Llama 2-13B share?
20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Haiku has 49 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-13B has 32.