Model comparison
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Llama 13b
Claude 3.5 Haiku is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.9 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.5 Haiku scores higher in 5 categories and Llama 13b in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Claude 3.5 Haiku leads 42.9 to 13.9.
- Llama 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 3.5 Haiku | Llama 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 28.9 | 23.9 |
| Released | 2024-10-22 | 2023-02-24 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 49 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude 3.5 Haiku leads
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 32.6 (#258), Llama 13b: 20.9 (#332)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1287 | 683 |
| Aider Polyglot | 28% | — |
| SciCode | 27.4% | — |
| WeirdML | 30.7% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 46.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 51.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59% | — |
| CadEval | 32% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 27.7 (#90), Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 19.3% | — |
Reasoning Claude 3.5 Haiku leads
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 17.1 (#286), Llama 13b: 13.4 (#327)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1251 | 728 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 127.15 | 100.09 |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 28.1% | — |
| DTBench | 56.7% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 48.5% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 37.9% |
| HellaSwag | — | 79.2% |
| LAMBADA | — | 75.2% |
| LiveBench | 43.5% | — |
| PIQA | — | 80.1% |
| WinoGrande | — | 73% |
Math Llama 13b leads
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 13.7 (#294), Llama 13b: 24.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1244 | 838 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.3% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 22.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 35.5% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 46.4% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 0.3% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 20.6% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 18.7 (#276), Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 74.3% | 47.7% |
| GPQA Diamond | 38.1% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 60.5% | — |
| Confabulations | 36.7% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 36.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1208 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 52.7% |
| BoolQ | — | 78.7% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 56.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 77.9% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 26.3 (#113), Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1092 | — |
| GeoBench | 34% | — |
| ScienceQA | — | 43.3% |
Multilingual Claude 3.5 Haiku leads
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 40.2 (#213), Llama 13b: 16.8 (#292)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1238 | 819 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1229 | — |
| LMArena French | 1262 | — |
| LMArena German | 1237 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1175 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1172 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1253 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1261 | — |
Instruction Following Claude 3.5 Haiku leads
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 63.1 (#229), Llama 13b: 36.9 (#300)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1241 | 781 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 61.9% | — |
| IFEval | 79.2% | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 38.3 (#195), Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1261 | — |
Writing & Preference Claude 3.5 Haiku leads
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 42.9 (#228), Llama 13b: 13.9 (#307)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1255 | 834 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1233 | 794 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1265 | 753 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.5% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1146 | — |
| WildBench | 76% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 35.4% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3.5 Haiku better than Llama 13b?
Claude 3.5 Haiku is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.9 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 3.5 Haiku or Llama 13b better for coding?
Claude 3.5 Haiku scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.6 versus 20.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Haiku and Llama 13b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Haiku has 49 scored results on Noometry and Llama 13b has 21.