Model comparison
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs GLM-4.7
GLM-4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 28.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 24 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 24 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.5 Haiku scores higher in 1 category and GLM-4.7 in 8 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GLM-4.7 leads 47.0 to 18.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 4.3% for Claude 3.5 Haiku and 83.3% for GLM-4.7.
- GLM-4.7 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 3.5 Haiku | GLM-4.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 28.9 | 41.7 |
| Released | 2024-10-22 | 2025-12-22 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 205K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.60 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.20 |
| Results tracked | 49 | 36 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.7 leads
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 32.6 (#258), GLM-4.7: 43.6 (#74)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 27.4% | 45.1% |
| LMArena Coding | 1287 | 1454 |
| Aider Polyglot | 28% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1435 |
| WeirdML | 30.7% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 46.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 51.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59% | — |
| CadEval | 32% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 399.48 |
Agentic & Tool Use Claude 3.5 Haiku leads
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 27.7 (#90), GLM-4.7: 26.4 (#96)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 33.4% |
| BALROG | 19.3% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 2,377 |
Reasoning GLM-4.7 leads
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 17.1 (#286), GLM-4.7: 23.7 (#161)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 1.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1251 | 1443 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 127.15 | 143.53 |
| SimpleBench | — | 47.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 6% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 28.1% | — |
| DTBench | 56.7% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 48.5% | — |
| LiveBench | 43.5% | — |
Math GLM-4.7 leads
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 13.7 (#294), GLM-4.7: 37.7 (#92)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.3% | 83.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1244 | 1423 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 0.3% | 2.4% |
| ProofBench | — | 6% |
| Omni-MATH | 22.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 35.5% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 46.4% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |
Knowledge GLM-4.7 leads
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 18.7 (#276), GLM-4.7: 47.0 (#74)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 38.1% | 83.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1208 | 1424 |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 32.2% |
| MMLU-Pro | 60.5% | — |
| Confabulations | 36.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 11.7% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 36.3% | — |
| MMLU | 74.3% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 26.3 (#113), GLM-4.7: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1092 | — |
| GeoBench | 34% | — |
Multilingual GLM-4.7 leads
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 40.2 (#213), GLM-4.7: 53.0 (#75)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1238 | 1417 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1229 | 1495 |
| LMArena French | 1262 | 1432 |
| LMArena German | 1237 | 1426 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1175 | 1439 |
| LMArena Korean | 1172 | 1401 |
| LMArena Russian | 1253 | 1423 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1261 | 1433 |
Instruction Following GLM-4.7 leads
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 63.1 (#229), GLM-4.7: 74.6 (#90)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1241 | 1411 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 61.9% | — |
| IFEval | 79.2% | — |
Long Context GLM-4.7 leads
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 38.3 (#195), GLM-4.7: 42.8 (#111)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1261 | 1432 |
| CL-bench | — | 15.9% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 10.9% |
Writing & Preference GLM-4.7 leads
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 42.9 (#228), GLM-4.7: 61.1 (#89)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1255 | 1436 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1233 | 1401 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1146 | 1413 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1265 | 1446 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.5% | — |
| WildBench | 76% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 35.4% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3.5 Haiku better than GLM-4.7?
GLM-4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 28.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 3.5 Haiku or GLM-4.7 better for coding?
GLM-4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.6 versus 32.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Haiku and GLM-4.7 share?
24 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Haiku has 49 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.7 has 36.