Model comparison
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.1 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 46 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 46 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.5 Haiku scores higher in 3 categories and Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads 37.9 to 14.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 4.3% for Claude 3.5 Haiku and 57.8% for Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025).
Side by side
| Claude 3.5 Haiku | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Noometry Index | 29.2 | 35.1 |
| Released | 2024-10-22 | 2024-12-06 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 49 | 54 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude 3.5 Haiku leads
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 32.9 (#265), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.4 (#315)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 28% | 38.2% |
| WeirdML | 30.7% | 25.8% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 46.1% | 45.9% |
| LiveBench Coding | 51.4% | 63.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1286 | 1350 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59% | 59.9% |
| CadEval | 32% | 30% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 13.5% |
| SciCode | 27.4% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Too close to call
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 28.0 (#95), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.1 (#92)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 11.4% |
| BALROG | 19.3% | — |
Reasoning Claude 3.5 Haiku leads
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 17.7 (#290), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#318)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 28.1% | 78.2% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1251 | 1346 |
| DTBench | 56.7% | 63.2% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 48.5% | 69.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 127.15 | 135.36 |
| LiveBench | 43.5% | 66.9% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 1.3% |
| SimpleBench | — | 31.1% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 37.8% |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| EnigmaEval | — | 1.1% |
Math Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 14.7 (#300), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 37.9 (#146)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.3% | 57.8% |
| Omni-MATH | 22.4% | 45.9% |
| LiveBench Math | 35.5% | 75.8% |
| LMArena Math | 1244 | 1352 |
| MATH Level 5 | 46.4% | 82.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 0.3% | 1.7% |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 18.7 (#281), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#213)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 38.1% | 64.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | 60.5% | 73.7% |
| Confabulations | 36.7% | 12.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 36.3% | 55.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1208 | 1339 |
| MMLU | 74.3% | 79.7% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 6.6% |
Multimodal Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 26.8 (#117), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.5 (#79)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1092 | 1158 |
| GeoBench | 34% | 77% |
Multilingual Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 40.0 (#218), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.4 (#149)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1238 | 1342 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1229 | 1373 |
| LMArena French | 1264 | 1391 |
| LMArena German | 1237 | 1353 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1175 | 1294 |
| LMArena Korean | 1173 | 1313 |
| LMArena Russian | 1253 | 1351 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1261 | 1363 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 62.9 (#234), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.4 (#97)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 61.9% | 85.8% |
| IFEval | 79.2% | 84.1% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1241 | 1336 |
Long Context Too close to call
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 38.3 (#200), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#203)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1261 | 1344 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 61.1% |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 42.7 (#234), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.5 (#190)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1255 | 1354 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1233 | 1340 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.5% | 73.8% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1146 | 1128 |
| WildBench | 76% | 80% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1265 | 1350 |
| LiveBench Language | 35.4% | 51.3% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3.5 Haiku better than Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)?
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.1 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 3.5 Haiku or Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better for coding?
Claude 3.5 Haiku scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.9 versus 28.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Haiku and Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) share?
46 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Haiku has 49 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54.