Model comparison

Claude 2 vs Qwen2-72B

Qwen2-72B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.5 to 24.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Claude 2 Anthropic

24.7

Rank #342 Reported

Qwen2-72B Alibaba (Qwen)

29.5

Rank #294 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2-72B in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen2-72B leads 27.9 to 8.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 11.7% for Claude 2 and 39.1% for Qwen2-72B.
  • Qwen2-72B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 2 and Qwen2-72B specifications
Claude 2Qwen2-72B
ProviderAnthropicAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index24.729.5
Released2023-07-112024-06-07
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked826

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Qwen2-72B: 28.7 (#303)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Qwen2-72B
WeirdML—11.3%
BigCodeBench Instruct—38.5%
LMArena Coding—1196
BigCodeBench Complete—54%
HumanEval+61.6%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Qwen2-72B: 16.9 (#138)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Qwen2-72B
TheAgentCompany—1.1%
METR Time Horizons—29.9%

Reasoning Qwen2-72B leads

Claude 2: 20.8 (#213), Qwen2-72B: 22.2 (#184)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Qwen2-72B
Epoch Capabilities Index120.08125.27
LMArena Hard Prompts—1191
DTBench51.9%—

Math Qwen2-72B leads

Claude 2: 8.7 (#314), Qwen2-72B: 27.9 (#232)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Qwen2-72B
MATH Level 511.7%39.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.5%—
LMArena Math—1235

Knowledge Qwen2-72B leads

Claude 2: 17.0 (#282), Qwen2-72B: 21.2 (#270)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Qwen2-72B
GPQA Diamond34.7%40.8%
MMLU78.5%82.4%
LMArena Expert—1171
TriviaQA87.5%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Qwen2-72B: 36.0 (#239)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Qwen2-72B
LMArena Non-English—1176
LMArena Chinese—1240
LMArena French—1169
LMArena German—1151
LMArena Japanese—1111
LMArena Korean—1083
LMArena Russian—1169
LMArena Spanish—1168

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Qwen2-72B: 62.0 (#236)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Qwen2-72B
LMArena Instruction Following—1181

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Qwen2-72B: 36.1 (#230)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Qwen2-72B
LMArena Longer Query—1193

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Qwen2-72B: 41.0 (#236)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Qwen2-72B
LMArena Text—1203
LMArena Creative Writing—1181
LMArena Multi-Turn—1195

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 2 better than Qwen2-72B?

Qwen2-72B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.5 to 24.7 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and Qwen2-72B share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2-72B has 26.

Related comparisons

Go deeper