Model comparison
Claude 2 vs Qwen-14B
Qwen-14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2 scores higher in 1 category and Qwen-14B in 1 category; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen-14B leads 31.2 to 9.3.
- Qwen-14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 2 | Qwen-14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 25.0 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2023-07-11 | 2023-09-24 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 8 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#288)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1071 |
| HumanEval+ | 61.6% | — |
Reasoning Claude 2 leads
Claude 2: 21.7 (#216), Qwen-14B: 19.6 (#257)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.13 | 113.03 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1027 |
| DTBench | 51.9% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55% |
| LAMBADA | — | 71.1% |
| PIQA | — | 79.9% |
Math Qwen-14B leads
Claude 2: 9.3 (#320), Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#227)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1068 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 61.3% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Claude 2: 16.9 (#287), Qwen-14B: —
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 78.5% | 66.3% |
| GPQA Diamond | 34.7% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 84.4% |
| BoolQ | — | 86.2% |
| TriviaQA | 87.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Qwen-14B: 27.5 (#275)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1041 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1077 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Qwen-14B: 52.4 (#289)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1031 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#280)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1028 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Qwen-14B: 27.6 (#299)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1051 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1028 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1022 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2 better than Qwen-14B?
Qwen-14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and Qwen-14B share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.