Model comparison
Claude 2 vs Phi-3.5-mini
Claude 2 has enough public results to be ranked (#346); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- Phi-3.5-mini has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 2 | Phi-3.5-mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 25.0 | 36.9 |
| Released | 2023-07-11 | 2024-08-16 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 8 | 5 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Phi-3.5-mini: 34.6 (#232)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 32.8% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 38.5% |
| HumanEval+ | 61.6% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Claude 2: 21.7 (#216), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 51.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.13 | — |
| PIQA | — | 81% |
Math Not comparable
Claude 2: 9.3 (#320), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.5% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 86.2% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Claude 2: 16.9 (#287), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34.7% | — |
| BoolQ | — | 78% |
| MMLU | 78.5% | — |
| TriviaQA | 87.5% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2 better than Phi-3.5-mini?
Claude 2 has enough public results to be ranked (#346); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and Phi-3.5-mini share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and Phi-3.5-mini has 5.