Model comparison
Claude 2 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 51.9 to 9.3.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 2 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 25.0 | 48.5 |
| Released | 2023-07-11 | 2026-09-21 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 8 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Claude 2: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1637 |
| SciCode | — | 51.3% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1504 |
| HumanEval+ | 61.6% | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Claude 2: 21.7 (#216), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 12% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1482 |
| DTBench | 51.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.13 | — |
Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Claude 2: 9.3 (#320), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.5% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 63% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1468 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Claude 2: 16.9 (#287), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1501 |
| MMLU | 78.5% | — |
| TriviaQA | 87.5% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 2: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1259 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1434 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1511 |
| LMArena French | — | 1475 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1409 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1456 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1463 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1463 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1400 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1451 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2 better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19.