Model comparison

Claude 2 vs Llama 4 Maverick

Llama 4 Maverick is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.9 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.

Claude 2 Anthropic

25.0

Rank #346 Reported

Llama 4 Maverick Meta

30.9

Rank #282 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2 scores higher in 1 category and Llama 4 Maverick in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Llama 4 Maverick leads 26.0 to 9.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 11.7% for Claude 2 and 73% for Llama 4 Maverick.
  • Llama 4 Maverick has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 2 and Llama 4 Maverick specifications
Claude 2Llama 4 Maverick
ProviderAnthropicMeta
Noometry Index25.030.9
Released2023-07-112025-04-05
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—4K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.19
Output $ / M tokens—$0.65
Results tracked854

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Llama 4 Maverick: 26.6 (#324)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Llama 4 Maverick
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—21%
Aider Polyglot—15.6%
SciCode—33.1%
WeirdML—24.5%
BigCodeBench Instruct—49.7%
LMArena Coding—1302
BigCodeBench Complete—61.4%
ALE-Bench—172.97
HumanEval+61.6%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Llama 4 Maverick: 28.2 (#91)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Llama 4 Maverick
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—37.3%

Reasoning Claude 2 leads

Claude 2: 21.7 (#216), Llama 4 Maverick: 10.1 (#342)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Llama 4 Maverick
DTBench51.9%61.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index120.13132.2
ARC-AGI-2—0%
SimpleBench—27.7%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—55.9%
NYT Connections (extended)—8%
ARC-AGI-1—4.4%
CritPt—0%
EnigmaEval—0.6%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1281
LMCA—15.9%
ForecastBench—57.5

Math Llama 4 Maverick leads

Claude 2: 9.3 (#320), Llama 4 Maverick: 26.0 (#262)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Llama 4 Maverick
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.5%20.6%
MATH Level 511.7%73%
Omni-MATH—42.2%
LMArena Math—1299
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—0.7%

Knowledge Llama 4 Maverick leads

Claude 2: 16.9 (#287), Llama 4 Maverick: 33.4 (#204)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Llama 4 Maverick
GPQA Diamond34.7%67%
Humanity's Last Exam—5.7%
MMLU-Pro—81%
Confabulations—22.6%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—8.2%
GPQA (HELM)—65%
LMArena Expert—1259
MMLU78.5%—
TriviaQA87.5%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Llama 4 Maverick: 31.6 (#105)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Llama 4 Maverick
LMArena Vision—1142
GeoBench—52%
SpatialViz-Bench—31.8%

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Llama 4 Maverick: 42.2 (#195)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Llama 4 Maverick
LMArena Non-English—1269
LMArena Chinese—1277
LMArena French—1259
LMArena German—1291
LMArena Japanese—1207
LMArena Korean—1203
LMArena Russian—1286
LMArena Spanish—1293

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Llama 4 Maverick: 71.7 (#146)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Llama 4 Maverick
IFEval—90.8%
LMArena Instruction Following—1267

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Llama 4 Maverick: 31.4 (#279)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Llama 4 Maverick
Fiction.LiveBench—46.2%
LMArena Longer Query—1280

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Llama 4 Maverick: 38.8 (#252)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Llama 4 Maverick
LMArena Text—1287
LMArena Creative Writing—1267
Short-Story Creative Writing—62%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—860
WildBench—80%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1289

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 2 better than Llama 4 Maverick?

Llama 4 Maverick is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.9 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and Llama 4 Maverick share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and Llama 4 Maverick has 54.

Related comparisons

Go deeper