Model comparison
Claude 2 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIASummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads 35.5 to 9.3.
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 2 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 25.0 | 37.6 |
| Released | 2023-07-11 | 2024-12-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 8 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 35.9 (#216)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 38.7% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1272 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 48.2% |
| HumanEval+ | 61.6% | — |
Reasoning Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads
Claude 2: 21.7 (#216), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 25.0 (#152)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1266 |
| DTBench | 51.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.13 | — |
Math Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads
Claude 2: 9.3 (#320), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 35.5 (#182)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1271 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |
Knowledge Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads
Claude 2: 16.9 (#287), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 34.1 (#199)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1242 |
| MMLU | 78.5% | — |
| TriviaQA | 87.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 40.5 (#217)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1245 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1263 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1227 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 65.9 (#213)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1252 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#215)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1238 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 48.4 (#203)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1283 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1269 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1275 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2 better than Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct?
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct has 14.