Model comparison
Claude 2 vs Kimi K2.5 Instant
Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2.5 Instant leads 39.4 to 9.3.
- Kimi K2.5 Instant has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 2 | Kimi K2.5 Instant | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 25.0 | 43.6 |
| Released | 2023-07-11 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 8 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Kimi K2.5 Instant: 42.6 (#97)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1404 |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1484 |
| HumanEval+ | 61.6% | — |
Reasoning Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Claude 2: 21.7 (#216), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 29.7 (#90)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1443 |
| DTBench | 51.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.13 | — |
Math Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Claude 2: 9.3 (#320), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.4 (#105)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1442 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |
Knowledge Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Claude 2: 16.9 (#287), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#123)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1440 |
| MMLU | 78.5% | — |
| TriviaQA | 87.5% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#50)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1254 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Kimi K2.5 Instant: 52.0 (#94)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1406 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1449 |
| LMArena French | — | 1403 |
| LMArena German | — | 1413 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1378 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1404 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1447 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Kimi K2.5 Instant: 75.3 (#65)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1430 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Kimi K2.5 Instant: 43.9 (#83)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1435 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Kimi K2.5 Instant: 60.6 (#95)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1420 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1381 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1427 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2 better than Kimi K2.5 Instant?
Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and Kimi K2.5 Instant share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.5 Instant has 18.