Model comparison

Claude 2 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash

Gemini 3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.1 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Claude 2 Anthropic

25.0

Rank #346 Reported

Gemini 3.6 Flash Google

54.1

Rank #33 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2 scores higher in 0 categories and Gemini 3.6 Flash in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 3.6 Flash leads 67.8 to 16.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 2.5% for Claude 2 and 94.2% for Gemini 3.6 Flash.

Side by side

Claude 2 and Gemini 3.6 Flash specifications
Claude 2Gemini 3.6 Flash
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Noometry Index25.054.1
Released2023-07-112026-07-21
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.75
Output $ / M tokens—$3.75
Results tracked846

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Gemini 3.6 Flash: 50.0 (#48)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Gemini 3.6 Flash
DeepSWE—46.7%
FrontierCode—34.4%
LMArena WebDev—1538
SciCode—52.7%
WeirdML—56.1%
LMArena Coding—1491
ALE-Bench—715.52
HumanEval+61.6%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Gemini 3.6 Flash: 32.3 (#65)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Gemini 3.6 Flash
APEX-Agents—46.9%
GDP.pdf—14%

Reasoning Gemini 3.6 Flash leads

Claude 2: 21.7 (#216), Gemini 3.6 Flash: 58.8 (#22)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Gemini 3.6 Flash
DTBench51.9%95.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index120.13154.25
ARC-AGI-2—60.4%
NYT Connections (extended)—89%
ARC-AGI-1—91.2%
CritPt—10.6%
Chess Puzzles—43%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1485
Mystery Game Puzzles—30%
LMCA—44.9%

Math Gemini 3.6 Flash leads

Claude 2: 9.3 (#320), Gemini 3.6 Flash: 57.3 (#40)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Gemini 3.6 Flash
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.5%94.2%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—58.9%
FrontierMath Tier 4—22%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—70.8%
ProofBench—36%
LMArena Math—1505
MATH Level 511.7%—

Knowledge Gemini 3.6 Flash leads

Claude 2: 16.9 (#287), Gemini 3.6 Flash: 67.8 (#8)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Gemini 3.6 Flash
GPQA Diamond34.7%94.1%
SimpleQA Verified—66.2%
LMArena Expert—1488
MMLU78.5%—
TriviaQA87.5%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Gemini 3.6 Flash: 38.5 (#64)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Vision—1298
Blueprint-Bench 2—31.2%
Furniture Assembly—23.3%
LMArena Document—1456

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Gemini 3.6 Flash: 56.5 (#19)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Non-English—1469
LMArena Chinese—1531
LMArena French—1504
LMArena German—1478
LMArena Japanese—1476
LMArena Korean—1431
LMArena Russian—1487
LMArena Spanish—1475

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Gemini 3.6 Flash: 77.0 (#33)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following—1466

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Gemini 3.6 Flash: 45.1 (#50)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Longer Query—1474

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Gemini 3.6 Flash: 68.2 (#27)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text—1479
LMArena Creative Writing—1465
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1604
LMArena Multi-Turn—1481

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 2 better than Gemini 3.6 Flash?

Gemini 3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.1 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and Gemini 3.6 Flash share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 3.6 Flash has 46.

Related comparisons

Go deeper