Model comparison

Claude 2 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.3 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Claude 2 Anthropic

25.0

Rank #346 Reported

Gemini 2.5 Flash Google

39.3

Rank #170 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2 scores higher in 1 category and Gemini 2.5 Flash in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.5 Flash leads 39.9 to 9.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 2.5% for Claude 2 and 73.1% for Gemini 2.5 Flash.

Side by side

Claude 2 and Gemini 2.5 Flash specifications
Claude 2Gemini 2.5 Flash
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Noometry Index25.039.3
Released2023-07-112025-04-17
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.30
Output $ / M tokens—$2.50
Results tracked854

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Gemini 2.5 Flash: 35.8 (#220)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Gemini 2.5 Flash
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—28.7%
Aider Polyglot—55.1%
WeirdML—41.9%
LMArena Coding—1424
ALE-Bench—661.88
HumanEval+61.6%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Gemini 2.5 Flash: 30.8 (#74)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Gemini 2.5 Flash
Terminal-Bench—17.1%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—56.2%
TheAgentCompany—41.1%
BALROG—33.5%
Vending-Bench 2—548.84

Reasoning Claude 2 leads

Claude 2: 21.7 (#216), Gemini 2.5 Flash: 18.1 (#286)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Gemini 2.5 Flash
DTBench51.9%76.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index120.13143.03
ARC-AGI-2—2.5%
SimpleBench—41.2%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—56.8%
ARC-AGI-1—33.3%
CritPt—1.1%
EnigmaEval—2.7%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1422
LMCA—27.5%
ForecastBench—60.6

Math Gemini 2.5 Flash leads

Claude 2: 9.3 (#320), Gemini 2.5 Flash: 39.9 (#98)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Gemini 2.5 Flash
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.5%73.1%
Omni-MATH—38.5%
LMArena Math—1415
MATH Level 511.7%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—4.8%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—4.2%

Knowledge Gemini 2.5 Flash leads

Claude 2: 16.9 (#287), Gemini 2.5 Flash: 36.4 (#168)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Gemini 2.5 Flash
GPQA Diamond34.7%—
Humanity's Last Exam—12.1%
MMLU-Pro—63.9%
Confabulations—16.8%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—7.8%
GPQA (HELM)—39%
LMArena Expert—1426
MMLU78.5%—
TriviaQA87.5%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Gemini 2.5 Flash: 41.8 (#32)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Vision—1253
GeoBench—76%
VPCT—46.2%
SpatialViz-Bench—36.9%

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Gemini 2.5 Flash: 52.3 (#88)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Non-English—1409
LMArena Chinese—1450
LMArena French—1433
LMArena German—1418
LMArena Japanese—1405
LMArena Korean—1385
LMArena Russian—1415
LMArena Spanish—1421

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Gemini 2.5 Flash: 75.7 (#54)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Gemini 2.5 Flash
IFEval—89.8%
LMArena Instruction Following—1405

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Gemini 2.5 Flash: 47.5 (#17)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Gemini 2.5 Flash
Fiction.LiveBench—77.8%
LMArena Longer Query—1419

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Gemini 2.5 Flash: 53.8 (#157)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Text—1417
LMArena Creative Writing—1400
Short-Story Creative Writing—76.5%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1137
WildBench—81.7%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1408

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 2 better than Gemini 2.5 Flash?

Gemini 2.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.3 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and Gemini 2.5 Flash share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.5 Flash has 54.

Related comparisons

Go deeper