Model comparison

Claude 2.1 vs Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)

Claude 2.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#345); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Claude 2.1 Anthropic

25.2

Rank #345 Reported

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both.
  • Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 2.1 and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) specifications
Claude 2.1Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
ProviderAnthropicAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index25.2—
Released2023-11-212024-09-18
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked76

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude 2.1: 26.2 (#327), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
WeirdML7.1%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Claude 2.1: 21.4 (#221), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
Epoch Capabilities Index119.27113.14
DTBench51%—
ForecastBench54.2—
HellaSwag—76.8%
WinoGrande—72.9%

Math Not comparable

Claude 2.1: 10.2 (#315), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.9%—
GSM8K—86.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude 2.1: 15.4 (#292), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
MMLU73.5%68%
GPQA Diamond33%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—60.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 2.1 better than Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)?

Claude 2.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#345); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper