Model comparison
Claude 2.1 vs Phi-4 Mini
Phi-4 Mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.9 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Phi-4 Mini leads 25.3 to 15.4.
- Phi-4 Mini has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 2.1 | Phi-4 Mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 25.2 | 30.9 |
| Released | 2023-11-21 | 2024-12-11 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 4K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.075 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Results tracked | 7 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Phi-4 Mini leads
Claude 2.1: 26.2 (#327), Phi-4 Mini: 28.1 (#317)
Reasoning Phi-4 Mini leads
Claude 2.1: 21.4 (#221), Phi-4 Mini: 22.4 (#195)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.27 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |
Math Not comparable
Claude 2.1: 10.2 (#315), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
Knowledge Phi-4 Mini leads
Claude 2.1: 15.4 (#292), Phi-4 Mini: 25.3 (#262)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 23.5% |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2.1 better than Phi-4 Mini?
Phi-4 Mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.9 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 2.1 or Phi-4 Mini better for coding?
Phi-4 Mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 28.1 versus 26.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Phi-4 Mini share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 Mini has 3.